midwest.social

MxM111, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)
@MxM111@kbin.social avatar

Black background would have been better.

HikingVet,

Rainbow

AngryCommieKender,

The law specified the background color.

UnderpantsWeevil,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Legalist authorization bureaucracies will hinge the draconian punishment for failing to hang a sign on the dye used to color fabric.

supert,

Or pink.

Son_of_dad, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item

I once called police about a car theft on a property I managed. We had had footage of the theft, the thieves, their getaway car, their license plates, their entry and exit, their faces visible on every camera. It took the cops two weeks to drop by to collect the footage and take a report, and they looked so annoyed, and didn’t even pretend to care. They straight up told me nothing would come of it.

But if you’re a corporation, they’re all over that shit. Minor shop lifting? Cops are there in minutes. It’s become clear over the last few years who the police work for, and it’s not us, the little people who pay taxes.

JoeBigelow,
@JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca avatar

Wouldn’t the getaway car in a car robbery be the car they’re in the midst of stealing?

Do you mean the “get to the job” car?

Son_of_dad,

It was a group of like 4 guys in one car, half left in the stolen car and the others left in their original car

ComradeChairmanKGB,
@ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml avatar

Protect (the rich) and Serve (corporate interests)

Dude123,

Not to be a devil’s advocate but the little people aren’t paying taxes. The top 20% pay the taxes for the most part, the problem is the money in the first place giving too small of a group of people too much say in how everyone lives.

psycho_driver,

I’ve paid more taxes in the past ten years than Donald Ass-Burglar Trump.

JokeDeity,

Devil’s advocate? You’re parroting words from the Devil himself.

vivadanang,

You do realize there are states where there is NO income tax, and everything is funded by regressive sales taxes that hit the poor and lower income brackets MUCH harder?

TX and WA for example.

The ‘little people’ as you so eloquently fucking put it, are paying WAY more taxes than they should, and the ‘fat greedy bastard’ people have accounting teams to prevent that for themselves. What an ignorant take. Fucking christ man stop licking boots and educate yourself.

be_excellent_to_each_other,
@be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social avatar
Kuvwert, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

I’ve seen this before, but I’ve never been able to verify it as being real.

TheRaven,
@TheRaven@lemmy.ca avatar
wjrii,
@wjrii@kbin.social avatar

It was a legitimate protest of a stupid law that uses a legacy of inconsistent thought and limited perception to do an end run around the first amendment, but the text of the law requires a poster per building, so if they have enough in English, there would be no "need" to accept or post them. Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls, I certainly don't see why they couldn't use one of these or to flank the posters they do post with lots of context or more diverse ideas.

UnderpantsWeevil,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls

You don’t become a public school middle manager in Texas by showing balls. You’d get weeded out before you even got through the substitute program for teaching gym class.

phoenixz, (edited ) to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Doesn’t that go against separation of church and state, and if this is government pushed, isn’t this a first amendment violation?

clockwork_octopus,

Hahaha! They don’t give a fuck

Muffi,

Look at the dollar bill. America has never given two shits about the separation of church and state.

HikingVet,

In god we trust was added in the cold war because the old saying may have promoted something other than capitalism

metallic_z3r0,

‘E pluribus unum’ was pretty good, but I liked ‘mind your business’ too.

Patches,

Fuck You. Got mine.

Is pretty on point for the current dogma.

grue,

No, it was added during the cold war because the commies were seen as godless heathens and the religious assholes in charge seized the opportunity to push their brainwashing on us using “do the opposite of the commies” as an excuse. There was never any legitimate concern about “e pluribus unum.”

It’s the same story as why they reflexively oppose almost anything proposed by a Democrat today.

HikingVet,

Which is a more detailed version of what I said.

Majawat,

The way it was worded basically said that it had to be the national motto, thereby not making it a religious text to bypass the concerns you mentioned.

Rev3rze,

What I don’t understand is how the national motto can be a religious one without breaking the first amendment.

Majawat,

It hasn’t reached the Supreme Court for a decision, but lower courts have basically said that it’s not establing a religion because it’s used in a secular and patriotic fashion. (My interpretation of my understanding of the ruling).

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aronow_v._United_States

You can blame 1956 Cold War era Congress (red scare) and Eisenhower.

FlyingSquid,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Welcome to the fun world of ceremonial deism.

JackbyDev,

Required ceremonial deism, even worse, yuck!

DarthBueller,

Fucking hate this. There is a local public meeting that starts with a prayer to the Evangelical God in Jesus’s name that I’m forced to attend because of my job. I hate being essentially compelled to participate in prayer. The SCOTUS precedent supporting this is 100000000% Christian bias.

Patches,

The SCOTUS precedent

Don’t worry they don’t believe in Precedent anymore. You just need to grease their wheels. I hear it’s cheaper than you think.

flerp,

It’s relatively cheap for their masters, but they won’t buck the leash that got them into their position

grue,

And you can’t disrupt the meeting by interrupting the prayer until they kick you out, because then presumably your employer would fire you, I assume? 'Cause if not, you should definitely ruin their motherfucking christofascist bullshit.

AngryCommieKender,

You could counter with a Baha’i prayer. They are still an Abrahamic religion, and they have literally hundreds of prayers for practically every topic.

DarthBueller,

I don’t want any prayer. It’s coerced religion.

HikingVet,

I would start invoicing people for your time until you get a legal cease and desist. Then sue them, just because they accepted responsibility.

Make it cost them money.

DAMunzy,

Interesting. I’m going to be petty and start defacing my money.

hglman,

The worst part is that for the people making these policies it really isn’t religious, just a thing they can trick followers with.

RickyRigatoni, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item
@RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml avatar

That’s nothing. I’ve heard of people getting the cops called on them because the cashier forgot to scan an item and they noticed after getting home and went back to pay for it.

son_named_bort,

Why would you even go back to pay for it?

RickyRigatoni,
@RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml avatar

honesty is a malignant brain infection

Unaware7013,

Further proving there's no reason to be honest with corpos

Syrc, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Rainbow background would’ve been the cherry on top

Thetimefarm,

I actually looked into this back when it was originally happening and the rules were fairly strict. It specified background color and wording but it didn’t give a language so this guy did about the best you could given the rules.

However it would be a shame if someone printed a poster with UV reactive paint that changed to something else over time while it hangs.

xia, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item

If they want to be more sure that all items are scanned, maybe they should hire and train people to do that.

JokeDeity,

No no, one person is enough for 30 registers. 🙃

ZombieTheZombieCat,

I am so sick and tired of having two people standing right behind me staring over my shoulder as I’m using self checkout at walmart. It makes me never want to go back there. I actually have never “forgotten” to scan anything, ever. Yet these mfs are breathing down my neck at every store, every time I go. Target is the opposite. I swear these LPs (the plain clothes people but with walkies, come on) and workers are next to me at all times when I’m shopping. But then they usually leave me be at self checkout. I guess by then their ridiculously invasive theft monitoring system has determined I’m not a threat or something.

Fuck both of these companies. And fuck them even more for running every smaller company out of business so we have nowhere else to shop when we’re sick of being treated like criminals and sick of being sold garbage at some insane markup.

Wooshock,

Or better yet actually have a more than a couple cashiers after 10:00 p.m. Walmarts are massive stores they’re not Buffalo wild wings or IHOP… You can’t run the whole place on one person. Needle dicks

Ookami38, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item

Remember everyone, if you see someone shoplifting from Walmart, no you didn’t.

darcy,
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

or any big store

Kusimulkku,

Where I live people steal expensive steaks and cheese from stores to sell so they could buy drugs. Not the most sympathetic bunch imo.

Facebones, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item

I was physically restrained by 4 Walmart employees, and convicted based on blatant lies from the LP manager (who legally counts as a “professional witness,” meaning her word is literally law) and a petty larceny effectively bars you from employment for 7 years.

What I “stole?” I was having a bad mental health day and missed a $5 pair of sunglasses on a $2-300 shopping trip.

When the judge started to say “no intent,” she cut the judge off and hollared how she watched me remove the tag “and that’s intent if I ever saw it.” Never mind that the picture SHE BROUGHT TO COURT still had it attached, because PrOfEsSiOnAl WiTnEsS hUrRdUrR.

darcy,
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

you went to COURT over 5$ ??

Facebones,

Yep. Obviously I tried to pay for them and pointed out I spent over $200 like fuck $5, but after she started scrambling and lying in court I think she was probably just bad at her job and desperately trying to get any convictions she could to avoid losing it.

Or maybe it just gets her dick hard. Idk.

darcy,
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

wow… im pretty sure the minimum is 200$ or something to be considered shoplifiting or illegal or whatever, where i live

Facebones,

Like it’s just a civil matter basically unless you hit $X in value? That’s pretty chill.

darcy,
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

im not sure. just what ive heard. if so, it is indeed cool

ZILtoid1991, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item
@ZILtoid1991@kbin.social avatar

Meanwhile to the rich:

"You've been interfering with domestic and foreign elections, abused your workers, and even appeared with a noted pedophile? What about you promise you won't do it ever again?"

Something, something, the law protects the ruling class, not the common people.

Cappurnikus,

Law protects capital.

TheDoozer,

I’d say the bigger issue is if the manager fails to pay an employee for all hours worked (intentionally or accidentally), they don’t get to have cops called to arrest them, it’s on the employee to try to claw back their own money.

Wage theft is a far more significant issue than shoplifting but police, DAs, and legislators aren’t chomping at the bit to address that like they are shoplifting, which should tell you everything you need to know about who our “justice” system serves.

xantoxis, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Apart from this, what if you just donated several hundred posters at once? They all have to be displayed?

Shrek,

That’s where I thought it was going.

XTornado,

One… Hundred… BILLION POSTERS!

httpjames,
@httpjames@sh.itjust.works avatar

New MrBeast video

visak, (edited )

No. They’re not interested in playing fair or being consistent. They’ll simply warp the rules to fit their outcome and declare these posters noncomplaint. You can’t out-maneuver people who simply cheat.

The assholes on that side of things are a mixture of those who actually believe and want the US to be a religious state, and those who simply are using religion as a method of control. That second group is happy to see religious conflict because a) it distracts from real problems while they consolidate money and power, 2) they can use the fervor to further solidify their support form that religious base.

This is absolutely not new and has happened before in history. It’s just sad to see the US going down this path.

xantoxis,

(I’m going to set aside the fact that your Very Serious reply to my joke post is off-tone, and actually give you a serious answer.)

If you sent hundreds of posters to a school, you would find some school administrators who were only too happy to have the opportunity to plaster the word “God” on every school wall because they’re warped. I acknowledge that’s a thing, let’s move past it.

Most school administrators either a) hate this shit, or b) don’t really give a fuck. If you pulled this prank on one of those schools which–and I really want to stress this–are not on board with the stupid law in the vast majority of cases, you are actually handing them a chance to pull a glorious act of malicious compliance. If I were one of them, I would comply with the letter of the law and wallpaper every wall in the school with these things. Give the kids and the parents a chance to see them, and complain. Who are they complaining to? Not you, your hands are tied, you’re just complying with the law. You will explain this very patiently to every single one of them complaining about a school where every surface says “In God we Trust”. You’re on their side, but the school board and your legislators need to hear about this, because hey, we’re on the same team.

You can even go with them, and testify that your staff had to spend hours putting them up, taking time away from school activities. What are you supposed to do? This hurts the children.

School administrators don’t make the laws, but they can act in a way that brings the issue to the forefront of everyone’s mind. School administrators can give the parents a good reason to take the fight to someone who can actually do something about it.

That might not work, in the end. Texas is run by lunatics, after all. But a huge pile of posters might just be the reason you sleep at night knowing you did what you could.

visak,

The idea of donating alternative posters has already been tried and that particular school board just ignored the issue: npr.org/…/texas-in-god-we-trust-arabic-signs-chaz…I’m sure they’d treat a donation of 100s of posters the same way.

And as I (not a lawyer) read the law it only says that a poster has to be displayed in each building and has to be donated or purchased with donated funds: capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/…/SB00797I.htmso I don’t think you as an administrator would get away with plastering up hundreds of posters around your school, but let’s say you did. The parents will complain to you AND the school board (i.e. your boss). They’ll say you’re making fun of their religion, you’re a communist, etc. Even if they law was unambiguously on your side, they’ll only see what they want to see. You’ll find your chances of promotion to be zero, or you’ll just be managed out. Even if the Board somehow agreed with you, you made a stink.

I have friends who are teachers and administrators, not in Texas, who have left or been kicked over lesser issues. The rest are looking forward to retirement.

These bozos passing these laws don’t understand irony. They just want misdirection, conformity, and compliant kids. We just need to directly tell them to fuck off at this point.

I’m sorry for my continued Very Seriousness.

PerogiBoi, to memes in Lex fridman is Joe Rogan in a suit
@PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca avatar

Stop looking to talking heads on podcasts to tell you how you should think about the world.

TheDarkKnight, (edited ) to memes in Lex fridman is Joe Rogan in a suit

I enjoy Lex’s longform style but man he does nothing journalistic, which drives me crazy. He’ll ask a hard question but never pushes back on answer cause he’s concerned about being friends with everyone moreso than actually challenging someone’s PR answer that never exists in reality.

When your topic is AI, and it’s at the forefront of national attention you’re pretty useless if you don’t have the stones to actually challenge these pie in the sky type answers the regulars give on his show.

Altman “It’s going to make money useless and probably result in massive unemployment. But I think everyone should have some say in the development in AGI and how we handle it.”

Lex “Wow that’s so noble. Anyways, do you think we can have AI friends someday.”

Like you don’t have to be mean or rude but you gotta have the courage to press some of these guests on their bullshit.

drdabbles,
@drdabbles@lemmy.world avatar

He can’t ask probing questions or he’d inadvertently expose the scam. These people are hucksters, plain and simple. Lex is getting that sweet ad revenue from rubes that think he’s asking deep or meaningful questions, and the fact people haven’t caught on to his scam blows my mind.

camelbeard,

I also don’t like that he sometimes interrupts his guest or just starts talking about something about himself instead of asking follow-up questions.

Anti_Weeb_Penguin, to maliciouscompliance in Pretty funny indeed (Crossposter note: thought it would fit here very well)

Southern US moment

Candybar121,

(another) Texas moment

Ultraviolet, to memes in Saw a news story people about people getting arrested for at Wal-Mart for forgeting to scan one item

Wage theft is the biggest form of theft by far. The biggest perpetrator of wage theft is, unsurprisingly, Wal-Mart. They have the audacity to call anyone else a thief?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #