asklemmy

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

gravitas_deficiency, in If Trump loses in 2024, do you think he'd run in 2028?

Well, when he dies, I’m gonna create a ton of Parler and truth social bot accounts and spread conspiracy theories with the end goal of persuading idiots on the alt-right to mount write-in campaigns for Trump.

But I will absolutely not consider doing that until he is dead and buried.

PizzaFacia, in What's something you're proud of doing?

Going to talk therapy. Getting married and having kids really pushed me and helps me keep going on the hardest days. I cannot have mental illness affect their lives like it did mine growing up.

1984,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

You sound like a good person. Hang in there.

PizzaFacia,

You are too kind, thank you. One day at a time

ryathal, (edited ) in Seeking Perspectives: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports

Women’s sports were explicitly created for women. Most men’s leagues allow women, but at the pro level there really aren’t women that can compete at the same level.

I think the focus on winning or trans athletes dominating is overblown and ultimately irrelevant. A Trans women winning an Olympic gold probably never happens, not because of biology, but because it’s mathematically unlikely.

For competitive leagues I think the fairness question is who gets the last spot rather than who wins. Is dropping a cis women for a trans women fair? Is allowing a cis women who took PEDs for a prolonged period, but has been clean for a few years fair? I think it’s reasonable that the answer should be the same to both.

For non-competitive leagues I don’t think it really matters at all.

paddirn, in If Trump loses in 2024, do you think he'd run in 2028?

Probably and Republicans will be too stupid to go with anyone else, hopefully he’s on his deathbed by then (if not gone sooner). At least Democrats will have to run somebody else, though not sure who in the current Democrat party would rise to the top. Hillary might make another go at it, but I could see Newsom or Warren going after it as well, but nobody really strong comes to mind.

thecrotch,

Hillary might make another go at it

She’s a smart woman, surely she must have realized by now that nobody likes her

paddirn,

Ehhh, I’d have thought she had realized that the first go around, however, she actually did win the popular vote against Trump in 2016 (Hillary: 65,853,625 votes (48.0%) vs Trump: 62,985,106 votes (45.9%)), so it’s entirely plausible that she doesn’t realize that.

Nollij, (edited )

I’m assuming you mean when she lost the primary to Barack Obama in 2008. It’s hard to argue that it was proof that she was unpopular when Obama went on to win the general election by such a huge margin, and even his reelection by a comfortable margin. It just serves as proof that Obama was extremely popular, moreso than her.

2016, OTOH, showed that the people (through a skewed system) preferred Trump to her. That’s a hard reality to dismiss.

Possible_EmuWrangler, (edited ) in What opera do you think has a good production that was shared freely on the Internet?

Not sure this is what your asking, but the Auckland Symphony Orchestra played Sandstorm. youtu.be/H9r597vJbSQ .

Edit: Ive now realized orchestra and opera are different, but leaving the comment.

drdiddlybadger, in If Trump loses in 2024, do you think he'd run in 2028?
@drdiddlybadger@pawb.social avatar

He will be dead but I would expect him to try a run.

charonn0, (edited ) in What's something you're proud of doing?
@charonn0@startrek.website avatar

Remember Valentine’s day 2004, when San Francisco county started issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples?

Thousands of couples showed up. Some from the other side of the planet, some from the other side of town. The County Clerk was overwhelmed and there weren’t nearly enough wedding officiants to keep up. So they put out a call for volunteers to be deputized by the Clerk as county marriage commissioners. I volunteered and officiated at dozens of ceremonies at city hall.

Still have my official commission hanging on my wall.

mxcory,

Okay, that is awesome.

SatansMaggotyCumFart,

I let a homeless guy know he dropped a nickel.

angstylittlecatboy, in If Trump loses in 2024, do you think he'd run in 2028?

He’ll be dead.

ZagamTheVile,

I really hope so but the absolute shit show when he does is going to be insane. The conspiracy theories will be like nothing ever imagined. It’s going to be nuts. I’d look forward to it but I could see it getting violent.

conditional_soup,

No, trust me, bro, Trump isn’t dead, he just had to go undercover, like Nick Fury

neidu2, (edited )

Yeah, I’ve been tempted to make an AskLemmy post based on that premise - “If trump dies on the campaign trail of presumably natural causes, what will the aftermath be like” conspiracy shitshow revolving around “Assassinated by the deep state” and/or “Biden directed CIA/FBI/SPLC/CCP/Pelosi to do it” is definitely going to emerge.

fubo,

It was the illegal immigrant trans furry Marxists, in the classified documents bathroom, with a hamberder full of vaccines!

SatanicNotMessianic,

Trump is now the Republican Party. He defines it and has virtually no opposition. Even the primary candidates mostly ran on the idea that Trump should win.

However, he also has no successor. When he dies, there’s going to be a scramble to figure out who can be the Trumpyest. There’s not going to be an orderly handover of power. I think it’s going to fracture their voter base between traditional conservatives, who will back someone like Ted Cruz, and the batshit crazy ones, who will back a Don Jr type.

Trump, for want of a better term, has the charisma that the entire party is hanging off of right now. Republicans have handed the fate of their party over to this man, because they have no real policies to sell to voters, and Trump voters don’t care about policy. Once he’s gone, there’s no one waiting in the wings to take over.

There’sno similar phenomenon on the Democratic side. There’s a handful of candidates from 2020 that I could see running again, including Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg, as well as newer candidates like Newsom. There might be an attempt to make Harris the heir apparent, but there’s no ride or die candidate the way the gop is with Trump.

JusticeForPorygon, (edited )
@JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world avatar

I’d love to see Ted Cruz and Ron DeSantis duke it out.

DeSantis actually scares me, he doesn’t give me the deranged lunatic vibes other Republicans have. He gives me the vibes of someone who wants power, and knows how to manipulate the people around him to get it. When I found out he was running for president I was actually a little scared because I thought he had a shot. I’m glad I was wrong in that respect. Let’s keep it that way, and avoid someone like that taking an elected seat.

TL;DR DeSantis gives me Hitler vibes.

Nollij,

You really wouldn’t. That’s how we got into this mess in the first place

JusticeForPorygon,
@JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world avatar

I’d love to see it, in the present moment. Two racists arguing over who’s the most fascist. I definitely wouldn’t like the outcome.

pearsaltchocolatebar,

Dude thought he could take Disney in a legal battle. He’s just a coked up moron.

mnemonicmonkeys, (edited )

He’s just a coked up moron.

Tbf, so was Hitler. Especially the last couple of years

PRUSSIA_x86,

He made a bet that he could win and instead he lost. He’s not a moron, he’s just too eager and played his hand early. Never underestimate a fascist.

pearsaltchocolatebar,

No, he’s just a coked up idiot. At first it looked like he might be a concern, but he’s no more competent than Trump.

Rooki, in Seeking Perspectives: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports
@Rooki@lemmy.world avatar

Hi,

@Zeon please follow the 2nd Rule.

neidu2, (edited ) in What's something you're proud of doing?

Do mean like a skill, a habit, or a project? Or something else entirely?

TehBamski,
@TehBamski@lemmy.world avatar

I can be anything you are proud of. I’m just asking that it’s something that you did.

Does that help?

neidu2, (edited )

In that case: I’ve carved out a pretty decent career despite no formal education at all, and virtually no network to lean on. I got where I am because I’m good at what I do, and my 30% paycheck increase when I was recently poached by a competitor proves it.

Also, I make an awesome porkbelly roast.

JigglySackles, in Seeking Perspectives: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports

Just make all sports unisex and it won’t matter. Except it does matter in some cases. Easy pick from the top of the pile is men’s and women’s gymnastics. There are plenty of comparative videos on YT showing one gender being able to do an event and the other being barely able or not able to do it. There are enough physiological divisions, that some movements and performances will be limited or enhanced by ones innate physiology. Skeletal structure, muscle structure, etc. It follows reason then, that a trans person can still maintain these advantages or disadvantages and therefore have an unfair advantage if they choose the related sport.

Honestly though, would really just rather them combine all sports as unisex and see what happens. Women will dominate some, and men others. I don’t see many women as dominating linemen in the NFL, but I likewise see very few men winning medals in women’s style gymnastics. Trans won’t even be a question anymore. Just give everyone the leveled field.

psychothumbs,

For a lot of sports the “male” league is already technically unisex, female athletes just don’t compete because they can do a lot better in the female leagues.

JoBo, in Seeking Perspectives: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports

Trans women who are using gender-affirming hormones are not “biologically male”. It takes about two years on hormones for their performance to equalise with cis women. The only advantage that remains is greater speed, due to the greater height gained from undergoing a male puberty. There are plenty of tall cis women, especially in sport, so this doesn’t really count as an unfair advantage. And, of course, trans kids who were lucky enough to get puberty blockers in time will fall in the same height range as their chosen gender.

I’m not going to pretend that it’s an easy question. It isn’t, and it’s not unreasonable for cis women athletes to be concerned. But the proportion of athletes who are trans is tiny and the proportion who are champions in their sport is even tinier. I do think that hormonal transition is a pre-requisite (because otherwise they would be “biologically male” with respect to the physical characteristics which matter in sport) but I don’t think anyone should be getting their knickers in a twist beyond that, and they should definitely not be using it as an opportunity to be cruel.

Most of the ‘discourse’ is pure transmisogyny, based on lies and fantasy demons. Most top professional athletes are biologically extraordinary, that’s why they are at the top.

I don’t have much time to hunt out sources but this is a decent thread from my bookmarks.

anarchost,

The only advantage that remains is greater speed, due to the greater height gained from undergoing a male puberty.

Solution: puberty blockers

JoBo,

For those fortunate enough to have had access to them young enough. I don’t think we should ban trans people from sport unless they did.

echodot, in So is the US slipping into Civil War?

So guys just in case, can you like maybe hand over your nuclear launch codes. You can have them back when you’ve calmed down.

Dolphinfreetuna,

Here you go

1-2-3-4-5

Spaceballs

tegs_terry,

Up until the seventies it was 00000000

uriel238, (edited )
@uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Apparently our generals take those very seriously. I had fantasies Mattis was going to stab Trump with a steak knife to stop him from pulling a Stillson. IRL, Mattis said I’ll get on that right away, sir …and then just didn’t.

I’m pretty sure Mattis was the top ranking agent of the Deep State and that figured into why he got replaced with Esper. In the meantime, there’s a long chain of officers who are eager to interrupt an unnecessary nuclear exchange.

anarchost, (edited ) in Seeking Perspectives: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports

Much ado about nothing. The biggest freak-outs about this tend to be by people who weren’t even particularly good to begin with. Like Taylor Silverman, the skater who lost to a trans woman… And multiple children as young as ten.

If you want to talk about hormone levels and time spent transitioning, there’s a conversation to be had, but the right isn’t having it. For example, the movie Lady Ballers was supposed to be a documentary that proved men could dominate women’s sports by pretending to be transgender, but everybody involved eventually backed out after discovering the effort it would take to actually transition, even for the purpose of showing up the so-called woke left.

During a recent episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, cast member and conservative commentator Ben Shapiro — whose previous credits include spending nearly 45 minutes throwing a tantrum over the Barbie movie’s existence — said that they originally intended to make as a documentary. But then they found out that (gasp!) a group of bigoted cis men in bad wigs can’t simply participate in women’s sports.

“As it turns out, most ladies’ leagues don’t allow any actual men, and [the actors] weren’t willing to go the full distance in terms of what it would require, the actual hormone treatments, to actually play in ladies’ leagues,” Shapiro admitted during an interview with Boering about the film

Of course, those conversations about testosterone levels will also unfairly target black women, who have been targeted in the past by the same shrill white women using almost the exact same tactics as we see today.

WelcomeBear, (edited ) in So is the US slipping into Civil War?

They’re just trying to “get out the vote” by forcing Biden to do something that they can point to and say “See! You were right all along! The federal government is going to invade and put you all in FEMA camps and make your children go to public school where they will be turned gay!!!”
I realize that that sounds absolutely stupid and it is. If I hadn’t already watched exactly that happen with Jade Helm I would never have believed that people could be that incredibly stupid, but it did and they are. Sigh.

I really hope Biden doesn’t take the bait and just deals with it after the election.

Same shit, different election:
“ On April 28, Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered the Texas State Guard to monitor the operation, writing: “During the training operation, it is important that Texans know [that] their safety, constitutional rights, private property rights and civil liberties will not be infringed”, and requesting “regular updates on the progress and safety of the Operation”.”

someguy3,

Jade Helm

Wow wiki even has a whole section on conspiracy theories. I feel stupider even reading that. Only makes sense under projection; the far right wants to do exactly what they project onto others.

JasonDJ, (edited )

The apocalypse failed to happen on September 15, 2015.[36]

Mic dropped by Wikipedia editor

Dude even had a fucking citation.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #