lemmy_support

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

fastfinge, in Version 0.19.1 outgoing federation issues for anyone else?

I was having issues with outgoing federation to Mastodon on 0.19.0. I just did the update five minutes ago, so we’ll see if that fixes it. If you’re seeing this comment I guess it’s working at the moment.

mrmanager, (edited )
@mrmanager@lemmy.today avatar

What we are seeing is that outgoing federation of posts and comments works after a restart, but new posts and comments made on the local instance are not federating to other instances until the next restart. This is with version 0.19.1.

Also after a restart, the server eats a lot of cpu for several minutes. Im guessing this is normal with the federation queue being processed but cant be sure.

fastfinge,

Good to know; thanks! I’ll keep an eye on it.

scrubbles, in Is that possbile to forbid other app to access my instance's API?
@scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech avatar

Only thing I can think of is trying to do some sort of filtering on the user agent header in nginx

tree, in Anyway to turn off or control the comment highlighting in 0.19?

It’s a bug in the dark theme CSS. On the light theme it’s a much more subtle highlight.

github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/2264

ech,

Ah, that makes some sense. Would still like more control over if it appears at all, but I’m glad to know it’s at least not intentionally that glaring.

BlackEco, in Lemmy Ansible 1.3.0 (Lemmy v0.19.0) update dramatically reduced performance of instance
@BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com avatar

By any chance, have you set database.pool_size in lemmy.hjson? You could try increasing the number to see if it improves performance

TheGreenGolem, in Seeing read-posts despite "show read posts" being un checked

It’s the same for me. I’ve already cleared the cache in FF and for Jerboa too. Tried to log out and log in. Tried to turn off and on the feature again to no avail. It’s the same on all of the instances where I have registration and migrated to 0.19.

Oha, in Anyway to turn off or control the comment highlighting in 0.19?

same. what is it even highliting?

ech, (edited )

As far as I can tell it’s comments made within the last 510(?) minutes or so.

JakenVeina, in Seeing read-posts despite "show read posts" being un checked

Same. Confirmed through both Jerboa and the web UI.

silas, in All posts in community have disappeared
@silas@programming.dev avatar

Same thing happened on !lemmynade from a new test account I created on lemmy.ml. All posts are still visible from other accounts.

Okokimup,
@Okokimup@lemmy.world avatar

I had read posts turned off

silas,
@silas@programming.dev avatar

Ah, it ended up being my language settings for me

sabreW4K3, in All posts in community have disappeared
@sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf avatar
glibg10b, in Why doesn’t my front page show me posts from my subscribed communities even if it says it would?

It’s a known issue

Vampire, in Why are some comments highlighted in yellow?
@Vampire@hexbear.net avatar

Those ones win you entry to the chocolate factory

Blaze, in How can I block posts from all bot accounts of specific instance?
@Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

!fediverser_network

It’s a project addressing the transition to new joiners to populated communities

@rglullis

silas, (edited ) in Possible to block someone in one community?
@silas@programming.dev avatar

This is not possible on the official Lemmy UI and as far as I know no third-party apps or clients support this either. What some third-party apps do support is hiding content based on keywords. If the content that annoys you has some words in common, maybe you could use those keywords in a third-party app to filter it that way?

bjoern_tantau,
@bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de avatar

Good idea. Let’s see if Jerboa supports this…

lvxferre, (edited ) in Please reconsider removing user aggregate scores from the API
@lvxferre@lemmy.ml avatar

I’m a nobody, but I’m officially supporting this decision of the devs to remove karma (user score aggregates) from the API. Because karma brings on a plethora of problems¹:

  • It is gamification of the system. As hinted by their PR, this is not healthy.
  • It leads to less varied and less interesting content, due to the fluff principle.
  • It feeds echo chambers, by giving people yet another reason to not confront them, even when moral and sensible to do so.
  • It shifts the focus from the content to the people, detracting from the experience of what boils down to a bunch of forums.
  • It is yet another reason for people to congregate in oversized and unruly communities, instead of splitting into smaller ones.

Re-enable it at the API level and continue hiding it in Lemmy-UI if that is your personal stance on the matter.

A lot of those issues will affect negatively your user experience, regardless of you using the karma feature or not. Simply because other people use it.

And it’s also the sort of "lead acetate"² feature that makes clueless users annoy the shit out of interface developers, until they add it. “I dun unrurrstand, y u not enable karma? Y u’re app defective lol l mao” style. With app devs eventually caving in.

As such, “leave it optional” is probably a bad approach.

Considering how easy it is to spin up troll accounts or amass multiple troll accounts across multiple instances, removing a useful metric for identifying them at a glance is, IMO, irresponsible.

This is a poor argument. It has some merit in Reddit³, but not in Lemmy.

You aren’t identifying trolls by karma. You’re assuming that someone is a troll, based on a bad correlation. Plenty users get low karma for unrelated reasons (false positive - e.g. newbie user unknowingly violating some “unspoken rule” of the local echo chamber), and plenty trolls get past your arbitrary karma wall³ (false negative).

So relying on karma to decide who’s a troll is not as effective as it looks like, and it’s specially unfair to newcomers, thus discouraging the renovation of the community. IMO it’s a damn shitty moderator practice.

Since trolling is mostly an issue when you get the same obnoxious troll[s] coming back over and over and over, under new accounts, to post gaping anuses again, and mods have no way to detect if the troll came back, mods should be upstreaming this issue to the admins of the instance of their comm - because the admins likely have access to your IP⁴, and can prevent the user from creating a new trolling account every 15 days.

And, if for some reason the admins are uncaring or uncooperative, the mods should be migrating the comm to another instance.

What Lemmy needs is not to enable shitty moderation practices. It needs better mod tools to enable good moderation practices:

  • the context of the content being reported should be immediately obvious, no clicks needed
  • there should be a quick way to check all submissions/comments of a user to your community
  • there should be a way to keep notes about users, and share them with the rest of the mod team
  • some automod functionality. Such as automatically reporting (not removing!) content or replying to the user based on a few criteria defined by the mods.

e.g. #2: If someone posts a particularly toxic comment but their score is high, I’m more likely to read through their history and conclude they’re having a bad day or something. Without the score, I will not read through and likely just ban them and move on.

IMO this is also a shitty moderation practice. Should I go further on that? [Serious/non-rhetorical question.]

NOTES:1. Since this is already a huge wall of text I didn’t go deep on each of those claims, but I can do so if desired/requested. 2. It’s sweet but poisonous. 3. Because in Reddit you can’t “migrate your sub to another Reddit instance”, and the only instance there happens to be administered by arsehats who give no fucks about you or your sub. It’s a dirtier situation that warrants dirtier solutions. 4. Anecdote exemplifying this claim: from 2020~22 I had multiple trolling accounts in Reddit, to shitpost in cooking subs (for some puzzling reason they’re cesspools). Guess how many times this sort of “you need more karma to post here” barrier locked me out? Zero. It’s simply too easy to comment some shitty one-line in a big community (I used r/askreddit for that) and amass 500, sometimes 2k karma points in a single go. 5. If instance admins do not have access to the IPs of the users engaging with their instances, regardless of where they registered in, that should be fixed.

ptz, (edited )
@ptz@dubvee.org avatar

Then join an instance where scores are disabled if you don’t like them. :shurg: Choosing an instance where downvotes are disabled is already a preference, so making the score aggregates optional is completely in line with that.

You’re already on .ml, so they’d have them disabled given it’s run by the devs who have removed the data from the API, so nothing would change for you.

The whole shtick of Lemmy is run your instance the way you want to run it. The removal of the scores from the API seems heavy-handed and feels like the devs are forcing their preferences/values on others.

lvxferre, (edited )
@lvxferre@lemmy.ml avatar

Then join an instance where scores are disabled if you don’t like them. :shurg:

Already addressed - a lot of those issues will still affect you, even if you don’t use the karma system.

Let’s say that instances A (karma disabled) and B (karma enabled) federate. A users won’t get the karma system itself, but they’ll still get: less varied and less interesting content, stronger echo chambers, and higher concentration of users in oversized and unruly comms. Because they use the same comms as the B users and thus the behaviour of B users affect A.

Choosing an instance where downvotes are disabled is already a preference, so making the score aggregates optional is completely in line with that.

Downvotes are a mixed feature, with pros and cons.
Karma looks good from a distance, but upon closer inspection it’s only cons. (Including enabling shitty=assumptive mod practices.)

You’re already on .ml, so…

I am clearly not talking about my individual usage here. I’m talking about users in general and the Lemmyverse as a whole.

The whole shtick of Lemmy is run your instance the way you want to run it.

I’m not sure on what’s supposed to be the [ipsis digitis] “whole shtick of Lemmy”, and I’m not assuming it.

The removal of the scores from the API seems [for me] heavy-handed and feels [for me] like the devs are forcing their preferences/values on others.

For me it looks like a sensible decision that takes into account its impact into users and the Lemmyverse.

EDIT: I’ll go further. Dunno if the devs agree with this or not, but I believe that “user aggregate score” = karma also attracts and retains users with the wrong mindset - who are not here to share, contribute or be part of something social and collective; but instead to farm virtual e-peen points for the sake of their individual egos. And I believe that this “it’s all about MEEE! ME! ME!” mindset is part of what makes Reddit such a dumpster fire.

glibg10b, (edited ) in details-summary HTML tags treated as literals (~~BUG or~~ SUE)

For reference:


<span style="color:#323232;">::: spoiler Summary
</span><span style="color:#323232;">Details
</span><span style="color:#323232;">:::
</span>

SummaryDetails

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #