I have the s10+ and it’s actually useful, as you can remap the double click on that button to open any app you like. But yeah single click, never happened intentionally.
EDIT: F yeah, I just checked the settings and you can decide if you want bixby activation on single or double-click. Now I’ve set bixby to double click and on single-click it opens my password manager. If you don’t select anything, it will do nothing on a single click.
The setting is under “Advanced Features” -> “Bixby Key” for me.
because most people are unaware of keybindings and when they inevitable tap on the new dedicated key they’ll probably be shown a subscription screen for Copilot Premium or whatever they call it.
IMO it’s a very disgusting and intrusive way of fishing subscriptions to the AI thing they’ve invested so much money on.
I absolutely love it, and I’m never going back to an ordinary distribution again. I do fine regarding software. I use standard channels, non-free channel, flatpaks and a few appimages. I can’t think of anything i’m missing atmo…
I had a security download (but not yet installed) ready yesterday. Logged off without installing. Turned on my device today and couldnt log in. Checked my pwd 3 times before seeing "authentication service not working " iirc.
After reboot it installed and logging in worked.
Is this related or not and is it expected? Not being able to log in without a mandatory patch first so to say?
Set up watch: sudo auditctl -w /path/to/your/file -p wa -k file_change_monitor
Check log: sudo ausearch -k file_change_monitor
Alternative solution:
If you know the file that is being edited you can set up watches with inotifywait and log it to a file. This may possibly not work because lsof might not be quick enough.
sudo apt-get install inotify-tools
then put this script in autostart
<span style="color:#323232;">#!/bin/bash
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">FILE_TO_MONITOR="/path/to/your/file"
</span><span style="color:#323232;">LOG_FILE="/path/to/logfile.txt"
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;">inotifywait -m -e modify,move,create,delete --format '%w %e %T' --timefmt '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S' "$FILE_TO_MONITOR" |
</span><span style="color:#323232;">while read path action time; do
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> # Get the PID of the process that last modified the file
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> PID=$(lsof -t "$FILE_TO_MONITOR" 2>/dev/null)
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> # Get the process name using the PID
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> PROCESS_NAME=$(ps -p $PID -o comm= 2>/dev/null)
</span><span style="color:#323232;">
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> # Log details to the file
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> echo "$time: File $path was $action by PID $PID ($PROCESS_NAME)" >> "$LOG_FILE"
</span><span style="color:#323232;">done
</span>
Don’t forget to modify the values at the top of the script and make it executable.
They aren’t asking about changes to a file describing the routing config, rather the actual in-use routing config. Unless the routing rules are modified through a couple of files (which I doubt), this doesn’t answer the question.
Well, the routes might manifest somewhere as files, but I don’t expect anyone to be able to viably parse them without commands like ip or ifconfig (or know where the files even are).
Some devices (like disks for example) are very straightforward to use as files, while some other special files (like USB devices) are so weird/ugly to use that everyone uses tools/libraries to access them (like libusb).
This is very off-topic, but there’s a great talk by Benno Rice that talks about this (among many others): youtu.be/9-IWMbJXoLM
linux
Oldest
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.