linuxmemes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

SigHunter, in There is no such thing as too many fans...
@SigHunter@feddit.de avatar

are all those 80mm fans? that must be loud

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

I don’t think so, they’re probably 120mm.

laurelraven, in There is no such thing as too many fans...

Not enough fans, I want it to ruin my hearing too

jenny_ball,
@jenny_ball@lemmy.world avatar

still quieter than laptop fan

genie, in Looks like I'll be distrohopping again!

Fedora + Nix package manager and never look back!

BiggestBulb, (edited ) in One of the few times I've downvoted
@BiggestBulb@kbin.run avatar

Being real, why DON'T distros just have the ability to do the installation if you double-click whatever file is downloaded?

I feel like we should have either option - download and double-click or just use the command line.

I mean, what else would double-clicking a .tar.gz file or an appimage do than install it (yes, I know, look into the archive, but really - how often is that the desired thing to do)? So, therefore, why don't we just have it install the files that are downloaded?

This is a legit question btw, I really don't know the answer

julianh,

How would the distro tell if the tar.gz is a program or just a bunch of compressed files? I tend to use tar files for compression rather than for distributing or installing software

Darken, (edited )
@Darken@reddthat.com avatar

By prompting the user to open as file / install as package

Like how many distros prompt (when opening executables) to open as file / run as a program

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

Yes, but the header of the file says it’s a binary, that is why it gives you the option to run as a program or open as a file. Because the OS knows that you can do either with binaries.

Darken,
@Darken@reddthat.com avatar

Is it the +x permission?

Why not use it the same way it is used in executables, but to indicate that a tar is installable

0x4E4F, (edited )
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

Some file managers might add the +x automatically if you choose to run the binary through the desktop environment (not the terminal)… or ask you if you’d like to mark the file as an executable (i.e. add +x to permissions).

You can’t do it the same way with tar, what are you gonna execute, tar is neither a script or an ELF binary. It’s like asking for a zip file to be executable, doesn’t make sense. You can change the extension to .exe, but it won’t run, it’s not an exe, no MZ header, nothing 🤷.

callyral, (edited )
@callyral@pawb.social avatar

Do you not know what a tar.gz is? it’s like a zip file. how are you supposed to install it automatically? the structure inside is unknown.

also, it’s commonly used for things like backups.

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

I mean, what else would double-clicking a .tar.gz file or an appimage do than install it (yes, I know, look into the archive, but really - how often is that the desired thing to do)?

Personally, I open tarballs quite often. Why? Just wanna know what’s inside them.

Double click translating to install on tar.gz is not wise since anything can be packed in a tarball, a gzip archive or a gzipped tarball.

And then you have a similar problem with tar.xz (it’s becoming more and more popular from what I can see). It doesn’t use gzip to compress the archive, it uses LZMA, so you have to use xz instead of gzip to decompress the tarball.

Basically, it boils down to how UNIX used to work. Mind you, back in the day there were no package managers, it was all done with .tar.zip or make install. This really was hell to be honest… keeping track of what app installed what libraries and versions of it… yes it really was a PITA. This is the real reason why package managers were invented (thank god!) and why having only one package manager on a system is the preferred way to handle apps/software. Otherwise, you’ll soon be in dependency hell. Shared libraries are at the core of any UNIX based OS. Yes, Flatpaks/Snaps/AppImages and package managers like nix circumvent this problem, but in no way is the problem gone. It’s still there, we just don’t mess around with it.

So, basically the idea of having an “installer” came quite late into the game. Plus, having to check on all dependencies and making an install script that worked on every single distro out there was just so complicated, that no one would ever want to go through with it. Sure, there are install.sh scripts in some pacakges out there, but they basically check nothig, it’s more or less “copy this here, that there” which of course could be done by hand anyway… and then run the app and pray it has all of the dependencies it needs 😬… which it never does 😂.

Chrobin,

A .tar.gz is a regular archive, the file manager shouldn’t assume it’s a program. Also, how do you expect it to work? There’s no general rule for archives. As for appimages, one of their selling points is that you can run them portably, so it shouldn’t install by default, but run. However, a right click install option would be nice.

kylostillreigns,
@kylostillreigns@lemmy.world avatar

Cause .tar.gz is not an executable binary in itself. It is more like a zip of the binary and its support files. Since it would be really difficult to distribute and maintain native binaries for every type of distro, application publishers used to just distribute for distros that has a larger userbase, like a .deb for Debian/Ubuntu and a .rpm for Fedora/RHEL/Suse, and then they would provide a tarball for any other distro. Flatpak and Snap have been introduced to eliminate this overhead from application developers, but they still offer tarballs as the newer solutions are still far from standardization.

BiggestBulb, (edited )
@BiggestBulb@kbin.run avatar

I 100% get that (and I know it's an archive), but I'm just saying why doesn't double-clicking a .tar.gz just run "tar xf file.tar.gz | sh" on that file? Or check if there's an executable in the extracted files and then run it if there is, and if it's just an archive of files then open the extracted folder?

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

What if I don’t want to install it, even if there is a binary in there? What if I just wanna open the archive and see it’s content?

The OS does the smart thing. The header says it’s an archive, so we treat it as just that, an archive. Commercial OSes like Windows and MacOS are the oddballs out, not Linux. It just interprets the cold hard truth - this is an archive, I have no idea what’s in it, you tell me what to do with it, end of story.

AlmightySnoo, in There is no such thing as too many fans...
@AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world avatar

Noctua gang 🤝

misterundercoat,

Just need to mod out that PSU fan and it’ll be perfect

AlmightySnoo,
@AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world avatar

The case also needs a paint job

thorcik,

PQ-483C PQ-2309C

flies away

DaddleDew, in There is no such thing as too many fans...

When the cooling consumes more wattage than the GPU

Pantherina,

Can you compile stuff in parallel using a GPU?

bruhduh, in There is no such thing as too many fans...
@bruhduh@lemmy.world avatar

c/onlyfans

PlasticExistence,

When you want to spend all your cash on blow

Ziglin,

I was hoping there’d actually be a community about pc fans under that name…

I am very disappointed.

Asudox,
@Asudox@lemmy.world avatar

Make one.

Ziglin, (edited )

I probably should but I don’t feel like I’m qualified to create a fan community. (As in I don’t know enough about fans) Edit: Also I’m afraid there’s a community under that name on the instance I’m from and there can’t be two communities with the same name and instance right?

Asudox,
@Asudox@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah well. onlyfans@lemmy.world is already claimed. Though you can create another account on a different instance where it is not created already if you don’t mind the hassle. I also don’t think you need to even know about how fans work just to make a community about images of literal fans. It’s your choice.

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

This is actually a good idea, I could create one like that on sh.itjust.works… it’s not against the rules, it’s not porn 🤷… well… sorta 😂.

Ziglin,

I would definitely subscribe, even if I don’t post anything.

TimeSquirrel, in There is no such thing as too many fans...
@TimeSquirrel@kbin.social avatar

At this point just screw an entire full size box fan to the side of the case as one of the panels.

onlinepersona, in There is no such thing as too many fans...

If that’s for FF, what about chromium?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

mumblerfish,

With both X and Wayland support!

PainInTheAES,

Compiling chromium crashed my laptop lol

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

Yeah, same thing.

JATtho, in Looks like I'll be distrohopping again!

So it is btrfs snapshot time again and making it a bootable backup before pacman -Syu?

I have had only single time I remember when the Arch upgrade truly fucked up the system: libreadline.so was broken so bash didn’t work. :D

I always have a second bootable system in case the main system is unable to boot… So I can at least troubleshoot the main system.

hellfire103, (edited )
@hellfire103@sopuli.xyz avatar

I have multiple devices, but I just use my trusty KNOPPIX LiveCD to unlock the disk and move everything onto an external hard drive before either troubleshooting via chroot or just doing a clean install.

unwillingsomnambulist, in There is no such thing as too many fans...

The one black PSU fan is throwing off the vibe. I can’t stop looking at it.

aberrate_junior_beatnik, in There is no such thing as too many fans...

Contrary to the meme, it’s probably very quiet, if they keep the RPMs low and the fans are arranged correctly

Octopus1348, (edited ) in There is no such thing as too many fans...
@Octopus1348@lemy.lol avatar

I’ll try compiling it now. Also, it took me a while to realize FF is Firefox.

Edit: It failed! I tried 2 times, it starts compiling, but after some time, I just find the terminal closed and it doesn’t run. Anyways I won’t bother with it, I only did it to torture my computer a little.

acockworkorange,

It’s obviously Final Fantasy.

zurohki,

Firefox only takes half an hour on my Ryzen 5800X desktop anyway. Modern CPUs can chew through those chunky compile jobs pretty quickly.

magmaus3, in There is no such thing as too many fans...
@magmaus3@szmer.info avatar

onlyfans

rony4102, in It happens 🤷

Takes gazillion years to boot

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linuxmemes@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #