movies

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

crypticthree, in Let's talk time travel

You’re sleeping on 12 Monkeys

RizzRustbolt,

People really don’t think it loop, but it do.

ExLisper,

They break the loop in the very last scene, right? The scientists is on the plane if I remember correctly.

hinterlufer,

Yes, one of the future scientists is on the plane in the (second to?) last scene. Why does that break the loop though?

ExLisper,

The entire point of the movie was that they didn’t knew who started the pandemic and were travelling back in time to try and figure it out. The scientists on the plane next to the guy who created the virus means that they did figure it out now, right? Or was is supposed to just be a huge coincidence?

Panron,

It’s been a long time since I’ve seen 12 Monkeys. My impression has always been that the end was meant to be tragic. That they were so close to being able to figure it out (the one person having actually been there at the time), but ultimately they never did, and never prevented it because it always happened. The scientists in the future are so focused on the 12 Monkeys group that the person that actually released the virus sits comfortably in their blind spot.

ExLisper,

I (same as the other user) thought that Bruce Willis manages to send a message saying that it’s not 12 Monkeys and that’s how they figure out it’s the guy on the plane.

Also, the scientists in the future wait for a message on the answering machine. The message on the machine changes based on what Bruce does in the past so it’s clearly not a perfect loop. Actions in the past influence the future so you’re back to paradoxes.

hitmyspot,

Oh, my interpretation was that after what we see in the movie, they now know the 12 monkeys is not the cause and get to the real terrorist to stop him.

Magnergy,

Iirc, the future government (? I guess) weren’t trying to find the source to stop the release, but to get a pure sample to study so as to cure the disease in the future. The lady on the plane was there to get the sample.

aaronstc, in Marvel Fans React To Martin Scorsese’s ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’

Read the headline and almost ate the onion.

Binthinkin, in Well, it was nice while it lasted?

SPOILER: Private Equity is POISON.

schnapsman, in George Clooney Says a ‘Great Script’ for New ‘Ocean’s’ Movie Exists, but He Won’t Call It ‘Ocean’s 14’: ‘We May End Up Doing Another One’

That one episode of Rick and Morty ruined all heist movies for me forever.

Delphia,

You son of a bitch, me too.

yoast,

IDK I saw Logan Lucky for the first time last year and it kinda blew me away. I think heist movies can still be great with the right script

Chaser,

From the same director as Ocean’s 11. I believe in the movie they joke that it’s Ocean’s 7/11

mycatiskai,

There was that interesting heist miniseries that could be watched in random order and still make sense. It was an interesting concept.

I believe it was called Kaleidoscope, all the episodes were a color. White first, Black last but any other episode order still worked.

canthidium,
@canthidium@lemmy.world avatar

Daniel Craig is so great in that movie. I’m here for the Daniel Craig funny accent universe.

AA5B, in Box Office: ‘The Marvels’ Gets Grounded With MCU’s Second-Lowest Opening Day Ever

Interesting to see the general negative impressions contrasted with the other column here saying how great it is.

I’m still deciding whether to see it in theaters - I’m a huge fan of the Marvel universe and still want more superhero movies. Iman Vellani does a great job with an excellent character, and I loved how the story connected with her culture. Fantastic. However Captain Marvel was pretty much a non-entity and we had no idea who Monica Rambeau will be yet - I hope the movie gave some much needed character development

Powerpoint,

Theatres are dead. The experience just isn’t as good as home and the prices are disgusting now just like the theatres themselves.

KneeTitts,
@KneeTitts@lemmy.world avatar

I have to agree, I hated Avatar 2 (liked the first one) and the theater experience made it 100 times worse. I went with an old friend that I havent seen in years, and a young guy in line behind us kept asking us if we were gay… like literally 20 times, he was completely obsessed with it to the point of harassment. I will NEVER go to a theater again, ever.

Soggy,

Until I can spend many thousands of dollars on a home theater room it will be an inferior experience to going out. I don’t need to pause to make snacks, or put captions on, or whatever. I’m happy to pay fifteen dollars for the occasional ticket and then fifteen more for eight cents worth of soda and popcorn loaded with salt and butter-flavored-oil because I know theaters don’t see a pock of the ticket money.

I want a comfy recliner, a giant screen, outrageous sound volume, and two hours of uninterrupted movie. The places I usually go to are clean, I’ve never had a problem with rude patrons (the occasional restless child at family movies, sure), and I feel like I get good entertainment for the money. It’s not a weekly thing, maybe monthly.

Chetzemoka,

My local theater is packed almost every night of the week. There were flocks of entire families with kids dressed up in costumes to see both Mario and Barbie. I traveled an hour to see Oppenheimer in proper IMAX and there wasn’t an empty seat in the house. Theaters definitely are not dead.

awesome357,

It can be very well executed, but that doesn’t change that it’s a movie nobody really asked for. Unless there is demand to see it then it doesn’t matter how well done it is. And endorcements of “it’s actually good despite expectations” doesn’t really generate a lot of excitement either.

Chetzemoka, (edited )

I am also a huge Marvel fan and I saw it Thursday night in a packed theater. My opinion is that all the pieces of one of the best Marvel movies are there, and just weren’t put together properly. The leads have great chemistry, Iman Vellani is brilliant as always, the main plot point makes for unique and interesting fight scenes, and they let it get goofy in just the right ways (princesses and kittens, that’s all I’m saying.)

But the overall pacing of the entire movie is SO bad. It feels so rushed. None of the fun or poignant things that are legitimately good are allowed to hang around on screen long enough to sink in. There are important plot points that move so fast they leave you wondering what just happened. Which is so disappointing. I was really excited that this might be the one that finally got Marvel out of their pandemic-induced production problems. Instead it’s just another Marvel movie that I’ll only see once.

Whoresradish,

I felt the same same way. It felt like all of these important parts of the plotline were skipped or got 1 line explanations. A lot of the emotional parts got about 5 to 10 seconds of screen time before moving on to the next part.

SpoilerCan someone explain how a giant intelligence kept the air and water on a planet from floating away and made sure the sun kept burning?

Chetzemoka,

Yeah that whole thing was glossed over. I don’t think it’s much of a spoiler, but it was the civil war that happened after the Supreme Intelligence was destroyed that decimated the environment. But no explanation how or why that led to the star being too dim. And the thing that was set up as the next big battle at the end of CM1 (destroying the Supreme Intelligence) happened off screen between the movies. It was just so frustrating

Whoresradish,

If you are a big marvel fan then go see it. It is not a great MCU film but it is also not bad. You will get some good laughs and fight scenes and get some mild emotional moments. I enjoyed it in theaters, but recognize that it is not as good as say GOTG3 or Spiderman NWH.

SeabassDan,

What I don’t really like is people telling me I shouldn’t let myself be swayed by critics and should watch it and make up my own mind.

That’s stupid. I’m reading the reviews to decide if I wanna watch it or not. I don’t wanna spend my money and a couple hours of my life to decide if it was worth it if some people whose judgement I’ve trusted in the past tell me it’s gonna be trash.

gornius,

Don’t get swayed specifically by critics. I swear most critics in the film and video game industry have the weirdest takes ever, while they should represent an average joe. There have been many movies which have been obliterated by critics, which have been quite popular and fun, as well as many awful movies, which have been praised by critics.

JasSmith,

The gap between critics and audiences has never been wider. The Last Jedi had an audience score of 42% on Rotten Tomatoes, while critics scored it 91%. It raises the question: what exactly is the purpose of critics? They used to exist to tell regular people if they’d like movies. That’s clearly no longer their goal. I’ve given up on critic scores entirely. I use IMDB ratings, even though Amazon has been caught deleting negative ratings about The Rings of Power.

Nefara,

Rotten Tomatoes scores are highly suspect now and especially can’t be trusted with Disney properties. The guy who runs it literally used to be a Disney Digital exec.

ours,

The “don’t listen to the critics” argument sounds a lot like what I’ve heard for many IMHO terrible DC movies.

originalucifer, in ‘Legend of Zelda’ Live-Action Movie in the Works From Sony, Wes Ball – The Hollywood Reporter
@originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com avatar

this is just a terrible idea. i cant imagine in any capacity how this doesnt turn into a full on disaster.

canthidium,
@canthidium@lemmy.world avatar

I really don’t understand how with the success of The Mario Movie, they didn’t just go “let’s do that again, but with another IP”.

secondaccountlemmy,

That would require having common sense soooooo

ch00f, in what are some of the most glaring and significant mistranslations in movies? add spoiler tags if necessary, please.

One of my favorites is in Volver. The woman murders her husband and had to come to the door when a neighbor knocks. She has blood splattered on her face.

The English translation has her explain “I cut myself,” while the original Spanish is a much funnier “women’s troubles,” which better explains the confused look on the neighbor’s face.

Varyk,

Hahaha! I saw volver!

The original translation is way funnier, thanks.

i_simp_4_tedcruz, in Gen Z is turned off by onscreen sex, wants no-mance over romance, a new study finds

I just hate the wet noises that accompany it. Same thing with kissing scenes where they have a shotgun mic basically inside their mouths. It drives my sensory issues up a wall.

DessertStorms, (edited )
@DessertStorms@kbin.social avatar

Sensory processing disorder gang represent lol
(no-mance ftw for other reasons too, but that's the biggest)

DAMunzy,

Macaroni and cheese time!

Smoogs,

It’s the same sound track they use for the walking dead when they are walking through the guts of zombies.

Queue the giant slurp at the end as the last noodle gets sucked in. And then the ‘ah’ gasp.

reddig33, in ‘The Social Network’ Sequel Not Ruled Out By Director David Fincher, But It’s “A Can Of Worms”

Nobody wants a sequel to Social Network. How about you work on another Mindhunter season instead?

slurpeesoforion, in Rogue ‘Killers of the Flower Moon’ Intermissions at Movie Theaters Spur Studio to Intervene

“My artistic vision includes bladder infections and discomfort. Piss your pants for my art genius.”

brain_in_a_jar, in I just watched Barbie, What did you guys think of the movie?

I suspect it is the real Ruth. The only explanation, is that she wanted to be in a movie

You mean Rhea Perlman?!

The real Ruth died over 20 years ago, fwiw

koberulz,

That Ruth is dead is explicitly stated in the movie.

tigerjerusalem, in Tron 3 (or TR3N) started production today.

TREN?

Much hype. So haxxorz. Wow.

blahsay,

So lame! It’d be bad enough if it was actually correct leet speak

I_Has_A_Hat, in The DCEU ends not with a bang, but a wimper.

what would you have done differently with the DCEU

Started it from the Nolan Batman movies instead of rebooting it again. The DCEU could have been the darker, grittier answer to Marvel’s movies. Instead we got a lot of formulaic movies that all look like a low budget CW show.

DragonTypeWyvern,

Trying to make DC a gritty Marvel is what fucked it up for them.

The core Justice League members are endlessly optimistic and idealistic, even Batman, and that is what makes them work.

Having Superman let a tornado kill his dad is what makes it fail.

TheFonz,

Eh. I think the issue is they were half assed gritty. Either go balls to the walls or don’t. None of this gritty shit peppered with smarmy one liners every five mins. Commit goddammit.

darkpanda,

I would have them study Superman and Lois. It’s the best on screen Superman since Reeve, and Tyler Hoeclin is the best Superman… probably ever. Even better than Reeve. Clark is a fully realized person and not just an identity for the off hours. Take some lessons from that series and you might have something.

Anticorp,

That was such a stupid scene in an otherwise pretty good movie.

southsamurai, in The DCEU ends not with a bang, but a wimper.
@southsamurai@sh.itjust.works avatar

Hopes? None. Warner Bros. has no fucking clue how to use DC characters and ideas in theaters. They may get lucky with specific movies being decent, but the best movies are not even as good as the worst of the animated movies and series. They keep throwing money and names at live action, instead of focusing on telling good stories that stay true to the essence of the characters.

I don’t see Gunn doing any better tbh. For one, he’s going to be hamstrung by whatever Warner decides is the goal. For another, he’s going to end up limited by whatever flawed view executives have of the servers characters. And then he still may not have a grasp of what either comics fans or non comic fans need from a movie featuring DC characters.

TheImpressiveX,
@TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml avatar

For one, he’s going to be hamstrung by whatever Warner decides is the goal.

Gunn confirmed that DC Studios is completely seperate from Warner Bros., they will just be distributing the films.

Hereforpron2,

I think that another risk you run by putting Gunn in this role after he found the only success in modern DC movies and series is pressure to become too Gunn-y. The same way that Marvel was so taken with Taika Waititi’s Ragnarok that they had him go even more Waititi on Love and Thunder, which clearly made it worse, and then tried to incorporate similar humor in other projects that fell flat. Sometimes playing to hard into a unique success just proves that it was either largely novelty-driven or that you just can’t recapture it.

southsamurai,
@southsamurai@sh.itjust.works avatar

Amen. Though, tbh, I did shed a few tears during love and thunder, so it wasn’t a total failboat.

I like Gunn’s style, but any time you just hand the reins to a single director, the risk of them cackling like a mad scientist and creating an abomination is high.

JJROKCZ,

Love and thunder is, in part, a story of the pain, loss, and grief of watching a cherished loved one wither away with cancer before they or you are ready. It was always going to pull tears no matter what else happened in the movie

distantsounds, in Conspiracy Theorists Think A24's 'Civil War' Is Actually 'Programming' Americans For Civil War

To be fair, they are fucking idiots.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • movies@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #