Norgur

@Norgur@kbin.social

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Norgur,

The flooding of Amsterdam was really epic, 10/10 IGN

Norgur,

I'd go with fucking Megaman. Shit unfair as fuck

Norgur,

Oi! You! Back into the matrix, you useless excuse for a AA cell!

Norgur,

Is this the birthplace of "instructions unclear, penis stuck in fan"?

Norgur,

Holy shit that's a beautiful animal. Is this real?

Norgur,

I stopped doing it. Was too difficult to get up. God I'm old.

Norgur,

I'd call it "perfection"

Help me choose my mobile browser

As per title, Help me choose a browser for android I have non rooted device. After all the researches I found best for me would be 1: Mull but with Some way for knowing which site have saved any data on my device (Maybe by extension or some defined page like about:config type) But as per my research I do not found any such...

Norgur,

I think you might try to bite off more than you can chew here. You keep insisting that you want to somehow see the data that's saved on your device. Why exactly do you want to inspect the local cache of those sites? What do you expect the benefit to be? And what's more: what do you expect such a local cache to look like?

Norgur,

Yep, I fully agree that those beings should wear a.mask. preferably a bite resistant one. And acid resistant because those look like they can spew shit.

Norgur,

"you want a rhyme meter with that? Because your lines severely lack it."

Norgur,

Well, DS9 it is then. I know it's hard to survive the first two seasons, but it'll be worth it.

Norgur,

Our phones aren't bad at reception, you are holding them wrong

Norgur,

HANS! ZE FLAMMENWERFER! GET IT NAOW!

Norgur,

Scrub: a reality show about doing the dishes

Norgur,

my favourite "Cyber-Security-Tool"? None of those logos up there qualify for that descrption... well... Authy perhaps...
yet, my favourite "Cyber-Security-Tools" would be
Configs:

environment:

  • PUID=110XX
  • PGID=110XX
  • UMASK=002

PasswordAuthentication no
PermitRootLogin no

Software:

  • Restic
  • Bitwarden
Norgur,

So "pay or you don't get shit" is okay, but "pay or see ads, your choice" is bad somehow?

Norgur,

So, before I start: I would not have said anything if you hadn't gone all "uhm actually" in a condescending tone towards someone who's just doing a silly little twist on the taxonomy thing on some inconsequential thread on the internet.

Might I point your professional attention as "scientist who studies lions" to the fact that the thread is about how "Panther" is not a real species but one of two other species with a different level of melanines in their fur? Good.
Now, would you care - in your scientific scientist way - to shift your attention to this thing you said:

They’re both. A panther is a panther and a member of the panthera genus.

My layman brain does the big confoosy-boosy! Isn't the point of the whole "useless party knowledge" type post here that panthers are, in fact, not panthers because "panthers" are not a species at all?

You said a lion is a panther,

They said that because - and this is true - "panthera" and "panther" are the same word. "Panther" is ancient Greek while "Panthera" is Latin and -depending on how your language adopted the terms- the plural of "panther". So an animal that belongs to the "Panthera" genus does belong to the "panther" genus, depending on the host language used. Since we already clarified that "panthers" are not a species at all, the only "panthers" are the members of the panthera genus. So yes, a lion is a panther. So is - to further ridicule your "sciency scientist"-attitude Panthera uncia. So yes, we have thrown the snow leopard in there, too.

Norgur,

Doesn't matter, it was fun to rip it apart.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #