@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

pruwybn

@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de

he/him

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

It’s a conspiracy by Big Rock.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/6bd017be-d958-41d4-9a47-bcd397cac756.webp

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Chicken loses job

Chicken is broke, chicken strips

Three seventy-nine

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

“No you aren’t”

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Take that, fythrn

pruwybn, (edited )
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I’ve tried Jerboa, Liftoff, and Connect. They all seem fine, but Connect is the one I stuck with.

Why do people not understand that you can agree with one thing someone said or did while disagreeing with the majority of what they stand for? (www.youtube.com)

An example is that I generally despise Jordan Peterson and most of what he says, but I often quote one thing that Jordan Peterson said (in the linked video) because I think it’s a good summary of why toxic positivity doesn’t work....

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

nuance doesn’t exist

I think it’s a little more nuanced than that…

What is Something Scientific that you just don't believe in at all?

EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something...

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Not sure why you mentioned chiropractors, I thought this was about scientific things.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/2c8706ad-d71a-4cfa-803a-944905f7ce81.png

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

No Toes comes in at the most states with 25, including Texas, and the highest population at 139 million. Second is Animal Toes with 11 states and 93 million people, California being a big help there. Florida and New York help get the seven Toes states into 3rd with 75 million, and the last seven Shoes states, with no highly populous states, come in at 27 million.

Not saying this is all that would determine the winner of a war, I just wanted to see what the numbers look like.

pruwybn, (edited )
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

For a passing grade - the easy way to calculate it is by calculating the chance of failing and then subtracting it from 1. To fail, you need to get the first two questions wrong (3/4 times 3/4) and then get them both wrong again on the second try (2/3 times 2/3 since you are choosing from the remaining 3 choices for each). So 3/4 x 3/4 x 2/3 x 2/3 = 1/4 or 25%, so you have a 75% chance of passing.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I would probably call it a piece of bread with an egg on it.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

A star is born? Nah… a star is CORN.

The Texas Superconducting Super Collider under construction, 1990s. (lemmy.world)

Excerpt: The Texas Superconducting Super Collider would have dwarfed CERN’s LHC, according to reports. It was designed as an enormous underground ring complex situated close to Waxahachie and had it been allowed to go forward, would have been considered the most energetic particle accelerator in the world. The project’s...

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

*under superconstruction

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IRB0sxw-YU

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Look a ledgers?

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Thanks, I was confused by the grammar.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Yeah, seems like it.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I think you meant estimable (worthy of great respect), not inestimable (too great to calculate), although I guess they both work.

pruwybn, (edited )
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Need to normalize the database. I would add a join to a BehaviorTypes table.

Edit: or, if the only options are naughty or nice, make it a boolean.

pruwybn, (edited )
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Me: Do you want to see my coat of arms?

My friend: Oh, you’re into heraldry?

Me, pulling a coat made out of human arms from my closet: What’s heraldry?

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

So who should be in charge of deciding who can have an instance and who can’t?

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

I think it’s a valid thing to consider. Due to the nature of the fediverse, there will always be small instances. I guess you could say their purpose is to allow Lemmy to be decentralized.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

If your instance hasn’t “seen” it yet, you might need to find it in the search tool for it to show up.

pruwybn,
@pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Why did this make me laugh harder than anything I’ve seen all week

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #