Because someone went out of their way to mutilate a video for no reason, so I’m gonna go out of my way to make it right. Just because you can’t be bothered to care doesn’t mean everyone else is just like you.
Today I learned that firefox doesn’t like to play certain types of mp4 files. I also learned that you can copy a video link and paste it into VLC media player and it will play!
Watching these books being archived is amazing, I would love to do this!
I also learned that you can copy a video link and paste it into VLC media player and it will play!
You can also use this trick to download YouTube videos without the need of a 3rd party website!
Copy the URL of the YouTube video you wanna download
VLC / Media / Open network stream… And paste your URL
Once the video has opened, Tools / Media Information
Copy the URL in the “Location” field and paste it into your web browser, you should have the option to save the video
It’s a couple of steps but once you memorize what you need to do it’s a million times faster (and I’d wager equally times as private) than finding one of those websites to give you a link.
This is probably the method that gives you the best quality (deskewing, lighting) without cutting the back of the book and feeding it into a scanner. (AFAIK)
I saw a book scanner similar to this one that used a vacuum to turn pages but otherwise same principle.
If it makes you dislike the woman speaking. That seems fine.
If it makes you dislike the woman listening. That seems fine, but I’d like to hear more context personally, such as her reply and the context of the conversation. For example, perhaps this was an out of context joke that didn’t land. It would also be important to know if the woman speaking had some sort of internet clout which could cause the listener to be afraid to disagree as it could harm her career and in the moment they’re attempting comedy, aka “yes and” technique. (Yes I apologize, lots of assumptions, its the nature of hypotheticals)
If it makes you dislike all women including those not making these comments. That does not seem fine because that would be vast generalization at best and mysoginy at worst.
The third situation has led mentally unstable people to murder women based on immutable attributes outside of their control, such as their perceived attractiveness.
To quote your post :
This post makes me dislike women
That seems to fall into category three. Quite dangerous and potentially harmful to society.
A better wording could be :
This post makes me dislike that woman
I think that comment is understandable to most.
In this case, choosing the plural is an aggressive selection and causes you to seem bigoted.
There’s a secret 4th option. The “I have a twisted sense of humor” and I was making a haha funny. I think it goes without saying that this lady is beyond disgusting.
Ah, if the goal of a joke is to make people laugh, then your joke does not appear to be very popular. But perhaps you are making this joke just for yourself? Your motivations are unclear to me.
Nonetheless, I appreciate your clarification and civil reply. I now better understand your perspective, but I do not share it.
I only make jokes for myself. I understand it comes off as sociopathic but I make posts here the same way I would talk IRL. When I look back at my post history, I giggle because I find that I regularly say things I find odd
Lol 🤣… yeah, he likes it 🤣…he starts falling slow motion to the ground to evade the attack and pick up something bigger from the neverending imaginary aresenal 🤣.
As someone with a BFA (without debt), no those are mostly the ones working at Starbucks, or taught themselves coding or webdesign after graduation. These are the nepobabies who can actually afford to attempt an art career.
Some are saying things, some are just doing stuff because they can. I’m not convinced it’s any less sane than, say, working in finance. It’s definitely less harmful.
The thing about art is that it’s whatever you can get away with. Sometimes that leaves room for powerful critiques of the system, sometimes it’s just random stuff. In order to survive in capitalism, artists have to keep producing art. This means that they’re incentiveized to produce things that are meaningless… Which is what most people in society do most of the time.
So these folks take some drugs and externalize the absurdity rather than fume in an office for decades before snapping and shooting a bunch of people or just offing themselves. Is it crazier to throw the absurdity of society back in it’s face, or pretend that any of this is OK?
Edit: How many people reading this are pretending to work? You could be outside touching grass. You could be inside by a fire. Every minute you spend pretending to work is a waste of your life. Imagine if you threw your computer against the wall, walked out of the office, covered yourself in paint, and started flopping against a canvas like a fish. Would you experience more joy than you are experiencing right now, trapped at work pretending to do something meaningful? Yeah, I’m gonna go back to work but I’m also not gonna judge.
But that still doesn’t make it good art. Sure, we aren’t doing anything productive as well, but at least the only ones that we lie about how productive we are, are our bosses.
Some of it forces you to think about what you’re doing with your life. That alone is a redeeming value. Most of that means nothing to me or is funny out of context, but the context could make everything. Or it could be bad. I’m not sure that it matters, but it’s really difficult to impossible without knowing the context (like, who’s the audience).
If I made a joke about tech, I’m guessing you might get it but most folks wouldn’t. Does that mean the joke isn’t funny or that the other people just aren’t in on it?
Depends on the joke I guess. If it’s something more commonly known, even if it is about tech, it would be funny for most people. Like the CD-ROM as a cup holder thing, that would be funny for most people.
Most people have this notion that tech people are like robots and get nothing outside of tech. That is true for most (I have to admit), but then you run into an odd ball like me. I’ve been to operas, plays, art exibitions, concerts (alternative music mostly). And I do enjoy doing all of that. Well, art exibitions not that much… depends on the art I guess. But yeah, I am very much into classical music, as well as the theater.
My point is, I like to dwell on social problems and constructs and why things are like this or like that and how we could make them better. And I agree, most of the questions regarding these things came through art (lyrics or a dialogue in a play). So it’s not that I’m cluless about life and how things work IRL. I do consider that it’s a shame that we have to do meaningless things in order to make ends meat, but that’s how life in this society is. I’m not delusional that a single individual (or even a million) can change how the world works. Thus, I do respect what the artists are trying to say, but they don’t usually offer solutions, just make us aware of the problem. Yes, I do agree that that is good as well, but I’ve seen this pattern over and over. Point to the problem with no real advice on how to solve it. I’m a problem solver, I don’t like it when a problem has no solution and becomes circumstance. Thus, simply pointing out to me that there is something seriously wrong with this or that is just not enough. Sure, if it’s entertaining, as an art exibit, OK, I can go with that… but that alone is just not enough to move me.
This is why I like movies like Fight Club. They don’t just point to the problem, but take real steps into solving it, no matter how absurd those steps might be (like banks have no backups of records offshore 😂). They still tried and had a step by step plan of doing it. That is what I like, a plan of action. Something that might not be thought of all the way through, but still, it’s a step in the right direction, and maybe we will change the plan when we see things aren’t what we thought.
People usually refer to me as the “gets the job done” guy. I either do it right or don’t do it all. I don’t like half baked solutions or endless meetings with nothing concrete to show for at the end. I would rather just start doing something about it, even if it’s wrong, then adapt the course of action, than just analyze to death and not actually do anything about the problem at hand. Sure, analysis is a very important part of planning, but from what I’ve seen so far in life, people do just that with no real incentive to actually start doing something about the problem. And that bugs me A LOT.
So, Fight Club is about how masculinity within patriarchy destroys men. A man who is an isolated consumer isn’t allowed to cry because he’s confirming to masculinity, he has a mental breakdown and turns to expresses his sadness as violence. At the end of the book he gets in to every fight until his cheeks wear away and he’s described as looking like a jack-o’-lantern. After he confronts Tyler and shoots himself, he becomes catatonic and lives in a mental hospital.
The fact that the plans wouldn’t actually do anything are part of the point. It’s just an unfocused attack on a system that dehumanizes. In the end, it just becomes part of the system he attacked. Which is also his critique of what became ecofascism.
The author is gay. A big element of masculinity is cisgendered heterosexual, as least in the US context and especially in the late 90’s when he was writing. He was excluded in some ways from masculinity at that time, while socialized in it. So he has a lot of reasons to explore and decompose masculinity.
Brad Pitt, when playing Tyler, understood the critique as well and continued to push on the what masculinity means. While regularly playing an architypical man, he’s often worn dresses. The fact that he can do both demonstrantes the malleability of the definition of masculinity (this is also called “queering” masculinity).
I know all this because that’s one of my favorite movies/books. I was in highschool when it came out. I was studying AP English, so I decided to my final paper on absurdism and antiheroes in Fight Club, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, and The Good Soldier Ŝvejk. But even after reading it and having a ton of context, I actually didn’t really understand it. It wasn’t until years later that I was able to revisit it through the lense of feminism that I understood how much of Fight Club is actually feminist.
Even though all the information was available to me, I still didn’t get it. Fight Club, Starship Troopers, Rick and Morty, and other films and media that criticize masculinity, violence, and authoritarianism are so often misunderstood by their fans… Like the point of Nirvana’s In Bloom. Could the fact that the majority of people who watch these movies completely miss the point make them, by definition, bad art? They fail, fundamentally, to relate their ideas. Isn’t that a problem?
I don’t think the fact that people don’t understand a piece of art makes it bad, and I’m really careful about criticizing art without having context… especially if I’m not the audience.
Context is super important. For example, a lot of people don’t realize that the whole “modern art is shit” meme was super important to Hitler. He claimed that Jews were creating “degenerate art” that degraded German culture. They did art shows that were compilations of things they didn’t like or didn’t understand before burning them… Kind of like this compilation. So things like criticizing the concept of modern art (especially out of context) or taking about sterilizing people with disabilities that I always push back on. A lot of people don’t know the connections with those.
I work in computer security now, and have for like 15 years or so. Almost every vulnerability is someone trying to solve a problem they don’t fully understand. Occasionally someone will try to solve a problem that isn’t a problem at all and make a problem in the process. Some problems people keep trying to solve when they really need to step away and let a professional handle it, like cryptography.
I’ve seen too many people make a huge mess trying to solve a problem they didn’t totally understand or didn’t comprehend the impact of a solution.I always ask myself if a problem needs to be solved before trying to solve it. In a world where people are making money off genocide, starving people, inciting terrorist attacks, and making life unlivable on the planet, is some people acting silly really a thing worth fighting against? It just feels a bit like punching down.
I think it’s less committing suicide, and more at the behest of corruption, unrestricted power, and a persistent lack of empathy.
But words are cheap, I will now perform eighty hours of silence and fasting. You must experience this with me to fulfill my my art. Only by the end of the period will you realize I was not participating, but instead exhibiting the role of the corrupted ruling class.
Also, I’m going to paint my weiner and slap it around on some paper.
Yeah I’m sure you’re talking from experience OP, lol.
You can tell by her confidence, if she wasn’t getting her fair share she wouldn’t be able to say what she’s saying so confidently, because looks aren’t everything, confidence and charisma can make up for a lot, plus it’s almost always easier for women to get theirs.
Really, that’s how acting works? Gee i would have never guessed that. /s
Do you know how to spot bad acting? The same way you can spot people lacking confidence, there’s tells, and she doesn’t seem to have any here, either she’s getting hers or she’s content with what she’s got going on in that department. Because realistically that’s what it’s all about, not like you would get a lot of aesexual incels, right?
But hey dude, enjoy that superiority complex you got going, I’m sure you can do so much better while hate posting two chicks clowning incels.
The same way you can spot people lacking confidence, there’s tells, and she doesn’t seem to have any here, either she’s getting hers or she’s content with what she’s got going on in that department. Because realistically that’s what it’s all about, not like you would get a lot of aesexual incels, right?
From what I could tell, she’s not asexual. If nothing else, overweight women usually have a higher sex drive and better orgasms (something to do with the fat and chemistry… I’ve read about it, but can’t remember where). The same is not true for men.
So, one, she’s either a REALLY good actor (not gonna bet on this to be honest), two, she’s getting her part (an arm can do much more than a penis can… not judging on kinks or preferences), or three, she’s asexual (not gonna bet on this either… especially by the way she’s dressed).
So, your point was, she’s probably getting it. I can agree with that based on what I saw. Is she getting it from who she wants? Not likely. Does she care? All she seems to care about is reddit and upvotes (judging by the firey nature of her reply and the length of it). Does that make her an incel? Technically no. Realistically, yes. If she does actually get it as much as she wants, but not by the person (persons) she wants to get it from, that’s mostly a male perspective (which can be true for overweight women). Imagne if there was an overweigt man sitting in her place and saying the same things she is saying and with the same ammount of confidence. Would you believe him? Over 90% of people would disregard it as a lie. Yet, she gets the benefit of the doubt. Why? Cuz she’s confident 💪.
But hey dude, enjoy that superiority complex you got going, I’m sure you can do so much better while hate posting two chicks clowning incels.
Wrong. The one trashing on incels is most likely and incel herself, but in another form and shape. If the question was “what is a porker”, I can bet you any amount you want, she was gonna go down in tears.
There’s likely some deep rooted trauma there which would be beneficial to have some professional guidance to uncover and address through rational eyes. Our brains will create defence mechanisms to protect itself from perceived harm, but the mechanism may not be a healthy one. A professional can help sus out areas of concern for you and give you new tools for dealing with those emotions.
Her unhealthy choices concerning social behavior and eating habits are likely symptoms of a deeper issue.
files.catbox.moe
Active