mander.xyz

dingleberry, to science_memes in i stg

Be respectful to you elders.

Raxiel, to science_memes in listen, little timmy needs to learn sometime

Don’t worry about the sun expanding to swallow earth! It will gradually get hotter as the core uses fuel and contracts, rendering earth uninhabitable within just 1b years (if we don’t beat it to the punch)

poweruser,

The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old and the Sun will expand large enough to make the planet uninhabitable in about 500 million years.

In other words, the Earth is already 90% of the way through its life cycle.

Don’t worry though. We’ll almost certainly make it uninhabitable for humans long, long before that time

Tomassci, to science_memes in OwO
@Tomassci@kbin.social avatar

cursed

Nobody, to science_memes in peas nutz

That, or this version of the simulation got very, very lucky.

miss_brainfart, to science_memes in Birding is Voyeurism.
@miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml avatar

All I’m doing is hiding in bushes to look at tits, what’s so wrong about that?

FlyingSquid,
@FlyingSquid@lemmy.world avatar

Personally, I prefer hiding behind dunes to look at boobies at the beach.

miss_brainfart,
@miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml avatar

Hell yeah, and always make sure to snap a few pics for the collection

trimmerfrost, to science_memes in i stg

Life is difficult irrespective of species. Humans have the special ability to comprehend and cry over it

ArmoredThirteen, to science_memes in Birding is Voyeurism.

I used to care for a tree frog with a croak I could mimic. Anytime I was nearby I’d do it and set them off in response. My understanding (which is limited and like 12 years ago) was that I had a male frog who was trying to one up me in response so he would get all the mates

ladicius,

But you did get all the frog mates?

Come on, buddy, don’t let us hanging.

Lamb,

Of course he did. He’s the reason tadpoles are shaped like sperm.

ArmoredThirteen,

She*

ArmoredThirteen,

Yes, I was drowning in frogussy

trimmerfrost, to science_memes in i stg

If it wasn’t for him, someone else would have

MBM,

Prisoner’s dilemma

Engywuck, to science_memes in listen, little timmy needs to learn sometime

So strangely true… My son got scared a few years ago while watching a documentary about black holes and the death of the Universe.

stebo02,
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

tbh that is kinda scary, just for different reasons

Nobody, to science_memes in Seriously???

Massive flocks of meaty birds. Like Godzilla-sized plankton that can fly.

breakfastburrito, to science_memes in peas nutz

Fun fact: he wanted to study mice breeding but the church said no because it was lewd. If he had he probably wouldn’t have figured things out since mice genetics aren’t as simple as peas.

ChaoticNeutralCzech, (edited )

He also kept bees in the monastery garden and tried to do experiments on them but it wasn’t known back then that bees mate high in the air, so his attempts to breed them were futile. Other monks were often stung or annoyed by the nasty bees so he quit beekeeping.

Source: Mathematics of Life by Ian Stewart. I also visited his museum on Mendel Square, Brno.

Once Upon a Time… The Discoverers ep. 16 also mentioned that the monks were annoyed at eating peas too often but I forgot to ask at the museum if that’s true.

SomeAmateur, (edited )

Imagine being the person in charge. You all are bound to celibacy, so you’ve seen and heard hushed tales of all kinds of …interesting side effects from living in that state for years.

This guy walks in and makes his sales pitch. He wants to keep mice in the monestary. And have them get it on. Mostly under his personal observation. For science. Totally not some odd perversion, promise.

I would have my doubts too!

Mothra,
@Mothra@mander.xyz avatar

I’m wondering, how come studying mice breeding was considered lewd when humans had already been breeding a variety of livestock (and selecting traits at this) for thousands of years?

SlikPikker,

Organized religion isn’t always rational.

breakfastburrito,

I think it was just the idea of this friar watching mice fuck seemed pornographic in a way. I don’t think maintaining mice colony was the issue, it was the sex.

ChaoticNeutralCzech,

He was a monk, after all. Breeding mammals is not something that celibacy-bound people usually do.

Swedneck,
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

presumably just status quo bias, we’ve always done this so that’s obviously fine, but this NEW thing is horrendous and must never be done

cyberic, to science_memes in You heard me.
@cyberic@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Quick Proof: Let k be an even number, then (k +1) is odd.

(k +1) + (k+1) = k + 1 + k + 1 = 2k + 2 which will be even.

trimmerfrost,

Meow

MBM,

That’s if you add two of the same odd number. The more general proof is basically the same though: let n and m be integers, then 2n+1 and 2m+1 are odd. (2n+1) + (2m+1) = 2n + 2m + 2 = 2(n+m+1) which will be even.

Pfnic,

This is why I failed at uni. I’m struggling so hard to make sense of such proofs, even if I understand the underlying concepts… :(

bitwolf, (edited )

It helped me to lean on the different principals as an example.

The easiest being Principal of Induction. Substitute m and n with 1,3,5,7,9…

After going through a few iterations you can see if it holds up enough to keep testing with other principals. (Super simplified).

stebo02,
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

Or you can just like, understand that an odd number is one more than an even number so if you add them together it’s two more than an even number, hence even.

lemmyseikai, (edited )

Which is the layman’s terms of the proof… I don’t get what your goal is.

Is it a building block for learning to read mathematical works? Yes, of course it is. Is this a ridiculous formalized statement? Yes, of course it is. But that’s the point. We need to practice the trivial to build the scaffolding to tackle the exceptional.

I am not wont to draw conclusions with minimal evidence, but your post seems like you are a malicious reductionist that may be suffering from Dunning Kruger syndrome. I apologize in advance if I have miscategorized you based on this limited sample.

Edit: I am never happy with my formatting.

stebo02,
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

I just wanted to show you don’t need any mathematics to understand why this is true.

lemmyseikai,

To confirm, you are asserting that the foundation for your answer (mathematical reasoning) does not require any mathematics to understand why it is true.

It’s very dangerous to take a reductionist approach and not be aware of the baked in assumptions you are using. For example, the terms even and odd (for this problem) are well defined as concepts for integers. Which means that your hand-wave statement is true as a result of definitions that were likely created to ensure this property held true.

The notion that “I don’t need math to understand why this is true” is like saying “I made an observation on a phenomenon and I don’t need science to know it’s true.” Which, as you are hopefully aware, is again reductionist and leads to a huge distrust of science from the science illiterate.

stebo02,
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

I don’t understand what you are trying to say. I just wanted to provide an easier way to reason why it is true, so that people who don’t do math as much as you do could also see the logic behind it. I don’t see how an easy to understand reasoning can be a bad thing?

kogasa,
@kogasa@programming.dev avatar

The proof is exactly the same though.

stebo02,
@stebo02@sopuli.xyz avatar

never said it isn’t

MBM,

Definitely, that’s how I’d explain it in words

money_loo, to science_memes in Seriously???

I mean it’s pretty well explained in the movie that there is actually an entire ecosystem of giant life forms living in the center of the planet, and that they sometimes accidentally find tunnels out into our world, duh! -pushes up glasses on face-

chiliedogg, (edited )

But being that deep would compound the square-cube problem.

money_loo,

You would think so intuitively, but once you pass Max q it actually reverses polarity and you become lighter!

Like putting too much air in a balloon!

Krauerking,

I can’t fucking believe they leaned into that… Like out of nowhere considering Kong island. And still haven’t brought it back up to do anything with it instead of immediately doing a journey to the center of the earth’s sun monster mash.

Artyom,

And they’re all nuclear powered.

HubertManne, to science_memes in peas nutz
@HubertManne@kbin.social avatar

Beyond his actual discovery his methodology really solidified the scientific method.

ChaoticNeutralCzech,

Yes but he likely forged some data. Statistics show a high probability of his pea counts with a clear 3:1 phenome split being too good to be true.

Source: Mathematics of Life by Ian Stewart. I also visited his museum on Mendel Square, Brno.

kadu,
@kadu@lemmy.world avatar

He also discarded a lot of data that didn’t meet his proposed patterns.

How do we know? Well, wouldn’t it be a nice coincidence if this motherfucker just casually randomly selected 13 different traits that follow simple dominance patterns - but none of the other dozens of traits that do not?

ChaoticNeutralCzech,

Yes, he did not quite follow principles of integrity. But let’s not understate the impact of his work on biology.

Evilsandwichman, to science_memes in really makes you think...

Um…you can, they’re called doors

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #