memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Annoyed_Crabby, in Pitbulls

Why would a junkie want Mr Worldwide?

BCsven, in Pitbulls

Employer: you have no skills, and we don’t think you will work hard. BC Junkie pushes shopping cart fiiled, with 60lbs of stuff, for 20km per day seaeching for returnable bottles. Climbs in and out of metal alot in clothing donation bin like the stretchy dude in Xfiles

AI_toothbrush, in The NYC subway banned dogs on trains unless they fit into a small bag, so this guy trained his Pitbull to sit in a small bag.

Portable assault animal

MelastSB,

So … a Pokemon?

AI_toothbrush,

You could call it that.

AllNewTypeFace, in Pitbulls
@AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space avatar

Username checks out

The_Eminent_Bon, in Pitbulls

No way can they afford a personal rap concert

Carlo, in It's coming.

Give her a break, she doesn’t want a lot.

BonesOfTheMoon,

Hahaha.

ZILtoid1991, in everything is fine I'm just overreacting
@ZILtoid1991@kbin.social avatar

That's how CBT works!

I often use stuff like that to deal with inability of getting a romantic partner. I just gaslight myself into believing "this ship has sailed for me, it's better to accept it, I cannot be lucky with everything". This usually works well, except I still tend to develop a crush on some person (usually a VTuber - they're not normal people, and neither I am), which then pushes me into instant despair.

I was thinking about selling this tip to incels in some form, under the name "nirvana-pill", but I don't think they'd listen to it.

ThatWeirdGuy1001, (edited ) in A meme for math people
@ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world avatar

I know I’m bad at math but I don’t understand how 2x0=0 but 2^0=1

How are they different answers when they’re both essentially multiplying 2 by zero?

Someone with a bigger brain please explain this

Edit: I greatly appreciate all the explanations but all they’ve done is solidify the fact that I’ll never be good at math 😭

GigglyBobble,

2^0 isn't multiplying by zero. Considering this law: 2^a / 2^b = 2^(a-b)
it's obvious why 2^0 = 1
If a=b you're dividing by the same number resulting in 1.

Unfortunately, I cannot explain/prove the first law though.

zalgotext, (edited )

The first rule is just simple division:

(2x2x2x2) / (2x2) =

(2/2) * (2/2) * 2 * 2=

1 * 1 * 2 * 2 =

2 * 2 =

4

Writing in terms of powers:

(2^4) / (2^2) =

(2^(4-2)) =

(2^2) =

4

The two bottom 2’s “cancel out” (really they just divide into one another to make 1’s) two of the top 2’s and you’re left with two top twos.

Globulart,

This isn’t strictly speaking a proof, but it did help me to accept it as it demonstrates the function that makes it 1.

2^3 = 2x2x2

2^2 = 2x2

(2^3)/(2^2) = (2x2x2)/(2x2) = 2

= 2^(3-2)

In general terms:

(x^a)/(x^b) = x^(a-b)

If a and b are the same number this is x^0 and obviously (x^a)/(x^a) is one because anything divided by itself is 1.

Hope that helps

hemmes,
@hemmes@lemmy.world avatar

Yes, of course, obviously…JFC, what??

Flumsy,

That was pretty complicated, here is a simpler answer I hsve come up with:

1=(2x2x2)/(2x2x2)=2³/2³=2³⁻³=2⁰

If that makes sense to you…

Globulart,

2^(a-b) = (2^a)/(2^b)

You can see this in the example above but perhaps it’s better to use different powers to make things a bit clearer.

2^5=2x2x2x2x2

2^3=2x2x2

(2^5)/(2^3)=(2x2x2x2x2)/(2x2x2)

You can cancel 3 of the 2s from the top and bottom of the fraction to be left with 2x2, or 2^2.

I.e. (2^5)/(2^3)=2^2

The quicker way to calculate this is doing 2^(5-3) which when you resolve the bracket is obviously just 2^2 or 2x2.

If both numbers in the bracket are the same the bracket will always resolve to 0, which is the same as saying a number divided by itself, any number divided by itself is one so it follows that any number to the power 0 is also 1 (because it’s essentially exactly the same calculation).

hemmes,
@hemmes@lemmy.world avatar

Rule = #^0 = # x 1

Don’t ask why…got it.

Globulart,

No not quite, #^0 = 1

hemmes,
@hemmes@lemmy.world avatar

Wait, so 5^0 = 1??

Globulart,

Yup

5^0 can be rewritten as 5^(2-2)

5^(2-2) = (5^2)/(5^2)

This is a number divided by itself so cancels to 1 every time, regardless of #.

Dioxy,
@Dioxy@programming.dev avatar

This dude is great at explaining math, including this: yewtu.be/watch?v=r0_mi8ngNnM

hypertown,

Well looks like some people already answered your question but let me show you quick proof video that may help you understand how powers work: youtu.be/kPTp82EGjv8?feature=shared

iamkindasomeone,
jendrik,

subtracting one from Exponent means halving (when the base is two):

2⁴ = 16 2³ = 8 2² = 4 2¹ = 2 2⁰ = 1

It’s a simple continuation of the pattern and required for mathemarical rules to work.

uberrice,

This is confidently wrong.

3^0 is also 1. 2738394728^0 is also 1.

Edit: just saw that technically you’re correct - sure.

IF base 2, Exponent reduction equals to halving - dividing by 2.

For x^y reducing y by one is equal to dividing by x, then we have the proof it always works.

Globulart,

But that’s because for 3 the sequence is dividing by 3 not 2.

81, 27, 9, 3, 1, 1/3, 1/9, etc.

3^4, 3^3, 3^2, 3^1, 3^0, 3^(-1), 3^(-2), etc.

You’re not always halving, but the method is the same and it sometimes helps people understand the concept more easily.

lugal,

You can think of 1 as the “empty product” (or the “neutral element of multiplication” if you want to be fancy). 2^x means you have x factors of 2. If you have 0 factors, you have the “empty product”

LordOfTheChia, (edited )

In addition to the explanation others have mentioned, here it is in graph form. See the where the graph of 2^x intersects the y axis (when x=0):

people.richland.edu/james/…/exponential.html

This also has some additional verbal explanations:

scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=2626

The simplest way I think of it is by the properties of exponentials:

2^3 / 2^2 = (2 * 2 * 2) / (2 * 2) = 2 = 2^(3-2)

Dividing two exponentials with the same base (in this case 2) is the same as that same base (2) to the power of the difference between the exponent in the numerator minus the exponent in the denominator (3 and 2 in this case).

Now lets make both exponents the same:

2^3 / 2^3 = 8/8 = 1

2^3 / 2^3 = 2^(3-3) = 2^0 = 1

TokyoMonsterTrucker, (edited )

Easiest explanation I can think of using the division law for exponents: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/0f7298bc-10d1-43a8-ac42-2b1ad03eb9f4.png

Since we can use any number for the initial fraction, as long as the denominator is the same as the numerator, any number to the zeroth power is equal to 1. In general terms, then, for any number, x: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/e71388e5-0583-4fab-a2db-1668bf41f35d.png

ShaunaTheDead,
@ShaunaTheDead@kbin.social avatar

I see other people have posted good explanations, but I think the simplest explanation has to do with how you break down numbers. Lets take a number, say, 124. We can rewrite it as 100 + 20 + 4 and we can rewrite that as 1 * 10^2 + 2 * 10^1 + 4 * 10^0 and I think you can see why anything raised to the 0th power has to equal 1. Numbers and math wouldn't work if it didn't.

DSTGU,

0 is the neutral element for addition. This is why when we have a number then 0 + number = number (0 doesnt change the value in addition) and why 0 x number = 0 (if you add a number 0 times you will have 0). (Multiplication is adding one of the numbers to itself the number of times designated by the second number)

The same way 1 is the neutral element for multiplication. This is why when you have some number then 1 * number = number. This is also why number^0 = 1 (if you never multiply by a number you are left with the neutral element. It would be weird if powering by 0 left you with 0 for example because of how negative powers work)

This is the level 1 answer.

The level 0 answer is that it is this way because all of mathematics is a construct designed to ease problem solving and all people collectively agreed that doing it this way is way more useful (because it is)

Choose which one you want

ThatWeirdGuy1001,
@ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world avatar

Fuck me this is the only one I understand 😭

Floey,

I like to think of it this way:
2^3 is the same as 2 x 2 x 2.
But you can arbitrarily multiply by as many 1s as you want because 1 has the identity property for multiplication.
So we can also write 2^3 as 2 x 2 x 2 x 1 x 1.
2^2 as 2 x 2 x 1 x 1.
2^1 as 2 x 1 x 1.
2^0 as 1 x 1 or just 1.

Multiplying a number by another number is the same as adding a number to itself that many times. And 0 is has the identity property for addition, so similarly:
2 x 3 = 2 + 2 + 2 + 0 + 0
2 x 2 = 2 + 2 + 0 + 0
2 x 1 = 2 + 0 + 0
2 x 0 = 0 + 0

BlazingFlames6073,
@BlazingFlames6073@lemdro.id avatar

Thanks, I couldn’t even tell what the image was about math. I thought a dirty joke was hidden somewhere involving the 0. Didn’t realize it was small and floating above on the right so people would immediately realize it’s a power lol. Many people hide clever things but I always approach them in the wrong way lol.

Haus, in A meme for math people
@Haus@kbin.social avatar

It's been a while, but I think I remember this one. Lim 1/n =0 as n approaches infinity. Let x^0 be undefined. For any e>0 there exists an n such that |x^(1/n) -1| < e. If you desire x^(1/n) to be continuous at 0, you define x^0 as 1.

E2a: since x^(1/n)>1, you can drop the abs bars. I think you can get an inequality to pick n using logs.

uberrice,

Simpler: x^1 = x, x^-1 = 1/x

x^1 * x^-1 = x^0 = x/x = 1.

Of course, your explanation is the “correct” one - why it’s possible that x^0=1. Mine is the simple version that shows how logic checks out using algebraic rules.

Urist,
@Urist@lemmy.ml avatar

Of course you both assume x =/= 0 though.

trailing9, in Me trying to make a joke that won’t offend anyone in 2017. > My wife died in a laser accident, what is your problem?????

It is a blatant reference to an obscenely woman-objectifying scene in an overall misogynic movie. Why do you support wife beaters and wife-beating?

leave_it_blank,

What movie was it?

trailing9,

Entrapment.

leave_it_blank,

Oh, I saw it in cinemas and had totally forgotten about it. I remember liking it, is it really that bad?

neshura,
@neshura@bookwormstory.social avatar

Looked up the scene in question on YouTube and I think it’s on about the same level as six-pack shots of men in movies - decently sexualised but not problematic imo.

Regardless I think @trailing9@lemmy.ml was just continuing the joke from the meme.

fox2263,

Was it Sandra bullock?

trailing9,

OP is dressed all white like a sheep, that could give you a hint

SoaringDE, in The NYC subway banned dogs on trains unless they fit into a small bag, so this guy trained his Pitbull to sit in a small bag.

I love all the cute animal in bags pictures coming from New York because of this rule. I still think that was the main reason they implemented this

Asnabel, in If you're feeling left out it's probably because you defend billionaires who would mince you into fertilizer

Where funny?

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

Here

uphillbothways, in Me trying to make a joke that won’t offend anyone in 2017. > My wife died in a laser accident, what is your problem?????
@uphillbothways@kbin.social avatar

My family was on Alderaan. You monster!

VikingHippie,

I joined a dating service for Star Wars fans but it wasn’t for me. My mistake was looking for love in Alderaan places

HerrVorragend, in Me trying to make a joke that won’t offend anyone in 2017. > My wife died in a laser accident, what is your problem?????
@HerrVorragend@lemmy.world avatar

Even harder in 2023.

Soon, the only solution is to embrace the caused offence

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

You do realise this post was sarcasm?

Cockmaster6000,

You sound offended

randomname01,

I make jokes all the time, and I almost never offend anyone. Just don’t bully people and don’t say any hateful shit, it’s as easy as that.

BruceTwarzen,

I was in a bar last week where i haven't been in 10 years. Some of the same people still hang around there. I talked to a guy i knew for a bit and then turned around again. Then i heard them talk about how it's crazy that they can't joke and even talk normally anymore without people getting mad and offened. I turned around again, and asked them what they are talking about. What can't you say anymore? They were pretty drunk and just mumbled: you know, normal stuff. Do you just mean racist shit? You think you can't do racist jokes anymore? They were like: can't even say faggot anymore. You just did, you can say whatever the fuck you want, you just have to accept that people think you are racist pricks.
Small towns are interesting sometimes

RobertOwnageJunior,

I just do the racist stuff alone in my cellar.

randomname01,

Also, these idiots always ignore context. Like, if gay dudes amongst each other say faggot jokingly that’s totally fine (assuming they’re all cool with it, of course), but some straight dude saying it with a negative undertone isn’t acceptable at all.

Techmaster, in F as in frog

So Alex Jones was wrong. The frogs are turning gay because the females keep playing dead.

ma11en,

I think you only need the first 5 words.

the_Coffin_Seller,
@the_Coffin_Seller@lemmy.world avatar

If I remember correctly in this particular case Alex Jones was right - which is a very very weird thing to write to be honest.

Here is a deep dive by Oki’s weird stories

and his Interview with Tyrone Hayes

I despise Alex Jones He is a sad fart of a human being and I hate that it seems in his career of obscene, hurtful and dumb conspiracy shit there is one thing that he got actually right. Apes on a typewriter.

JusticeForPorygon,
@JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

He was kinda right. IIRC there was a study done that found that fluoride may have caused a slight increase in estrogen levels in male frogs, but I don’t think it was significant enough to effect their behavior

the_Coffin_Seller,
@the_Coffin_Seller@lemmy.world avatar

You’re right I should have said there is only a small amount of truth in his comment. I remember watching oki’s deep dive and the beginning kinda stuck in my head where he himself said that he doesn’t like the fact alex jones was correct on something

Franzia,

Sad fart. Who is a happy fart of a human?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #