memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

sagrotan, in aboutme.pdf
@sagrotan@lemmy.world avatar

Mine would be in markdown/LaTex with MathJax for the equations and stuff

XTornado,

Ah, the classic ‘About me’ document featuring more equations than a math textbook!

Are you showing your optimal life equation? I’m just here wondering if the solution involves more sleep or just a magical blend of caffeine and other drugs!

0x0,

$text{me} + text{you} = text{amazing}$

BluesF,

You need the math formatting on + and = that bad, huh?

Imgonnatrythis, in Flight sim people are on another level

I’d say good chance this guy does have a plane.

Nastybutler,

I’d put money that he has at least a small plane. I work in the motorcycle industry and there’s a large overlap between pilots and motorcycle riders for some reason. Quite a few private pilots have pretty well set up flight sim rigs at home. Not to this extreme, but most have the basics for running MS Flight Simulator

nonailsleft,

So they can fly the planes they want

aesthelete,

I work in the motorcycle industry and there’s a large overlap between pilots and motorcycle riders for some reason.

I got a single neighbor who has two different cars, a bunch of e-scooters, and builds different e-bikes constantly in his garage. Some people are just enthusiastic about modes of transportation I think…

Imgonnatrythis,

“pilots and motorcycle riders for some reason”

The suicide drive is strong. Also, I blame top gun.

Edgarallenpwn,
@Edgarallenpwn@midwest.social avatar

The two people I know with a pilot license also love motorcycles and top gun. Also cocaine.

Imgonnatrythis,

TbF who doesn’t love cocaine and top gun?

BURN,

Pilots and sports car owners too. Tbh I think pilots just like to go fast, on the air or on the ground

maynarkh,

Doing a PPL and I’m already considering getting at least a scooter. Easy and fast transport to the bumfuck nowhere area of the airport we fly from, I need to go regularly but never take any pax.

It just works.

CrayonRosary, in I think we've been had

I still use inches, but I’ve switched to using sixtieths of an inch as the only subdivision.

1-45/60" is what boring people call 1-3/4"

Kolanaki, (edited ) in Flight sim people are on another level
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

Some of those things for PC flight sims are straight up real cockpit pieces. Dude is simply buying his plane one bit at a time until he can assemble the whole thing.

I’ve installed Internet for a dude who had a setup this gnarly. And to top it all off, he lived on a piece of land attached to an aircraft museum. He really loves planes.

bufordt,
@bufordt@sh.itjust.works avatar

Building a plane one day at a time.

youtu.be/uErKI0zWgjg?si=1lzjtDY3qkK3lcKN

The_Picard_Maneuver,
@The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website avatar

Some people are so dedicated to their hobbies and I love seeing it.

An extended family member of mine hosted a reunion at his house years ago, and he apparently lived in a neighborhood where many people have small airplane hangars attached to their houses instead of a normal garage. It was nuts. You’re just walking through a normal-looking house in a normal-looking suburban neighborhood, go through what would otherwise be a garage door, and suddenly you’re in a big hangar.

captain_aggravated, in Flight sim people are on another level
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

Do you know how much it costs to annual a Cessna 172? You could build 3 of these rigs a year for what the aviation equivalent of a 1988 Toyota Camry costs to maintain and fuel.

bfg9k,
@bfg9k@lemmy.world avatar

This. A full sim rig still costs a lot less than an actual plane, plus it runs on electricity and not leaded petrol so it won’t send you loopy at 60.

Pyotr,

For what it’s worth, avgas is going lead free, and there’s already unleaded options.

Per the FAA

wizzor,

First time I got into one, this was my exact reaction: wtf this thing is like a 1980s corolla turned onto an aircraft. I was sure I’d get killed in that rickety pos.

Krafting, in You do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?
@Krafting@lemmy.world avatar
renzev,

Oh, he’s on odysee? Nice!

lorty, in Flight sim people are on another level
@lorty@lemmy.ml avatar

Maybe I just want to try that obviously terrible approach to check if I’m right about my skills you know?

mac,
@mac@infosec.pub avatar

The one with all the wind on that god awful little mud hill?

Justas,
@Justas@sh.itjust.works avatar

Have to land that Harrier vertically on the side of a dam.

repungnant_canary, (edited ) in Flight sim people are on another level

Most people mention the costs of owning aircraft vs a sim, but there’s another possible reason: health. People come in different shapes and forms and not everyone who loves aviation is able to get II or even III medical class. So flight simulation is their only option to be a “pilot”.

I mean, on VATSIM (popular aviation simulation network) there’s a group of visually impaired people who have made a special interface so they can fly an aircraft even though they can’t see!

Simulation (of any kind) gives many people what they can’t get in any other way. And as with any other hobby, as long as it’s not damaging to other aspects of your life, let people enjoy what they want

Crackhappy,
@Crackhappy@lemmy.world avatar

Wait, that’s super fucking cool. Do you have a link to the way they’re able to fly blind?

bane_killgrind,
Crackhappy,
@Crackhappy@lemmy.world avatar

Oh God damnit. You got me. I busted up laughing.

bane_killgrind,

I needed a giggle at work happy to do it.

But for real there’s a bunch of stuff. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TecHPonwJxQ

zenbhang,

To go along with this is also risk to one’s health and potentially death.

53 per 100,000 pilots was the death rate amongst pilots in 2018 according to The University of Delaware .

This doesn’t sound like a lot, until you consider it was the #2 most dangerous occupation in the US that year.

Behind #1 Loggers (111 per 100k) and ahead of Police Officers (14 per 100k).

So it’s one thing to have a flight sim rig and at worst fall off your chair. A whole another thing to potentially make a mistake in an actual plane and pay the price with your life.

ICastFist,
@ICastFist@programming.dev avatar

Adding a bit to that: you can do all sorts of stupid maneuvers in a simulation with zero consequence, like doing a barrel roll with an Airbus Beluga.

Plus, there are combat flight sims.

Nei, in Flight sim people are on another level
@Nei@lemmy.world avatar

Flight simulators are a pretty niche hobby. Spent a lot of time playing the Microsoft Flight Simulator - comes handy if you wanna study aviation or become a pilot.

TropicalDingdong, in You do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?

At a certain point, the world of the closed internet is going to face the issue of discovery, which is the only reason that they were successful in the first place.

Its really a great time for foss or fedi. It hasn’t been easier to compete with established players (like it is now) in a decade.

blender2142, in You do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?

By using the service, you agree to the TOS. What you are “rejecting all” to are cookies. Still scummy behavior tho

tyler, (edited )

You can’t agree to it until you visit the website and actually read it. Your logic doesn’t really follow

Edit: for those downvoting here’s an article from the EFF agreeing with me. eff.org/…/clicks-bind-ways-users-agree-online-ter…

However, courts generally do not require that you actually have read the terms, but just that you had reasonable notice and an opportunity to read them.

echo64,

Nope. Not how it works. You don’t have to agree to anything. You don’t have to read anything. The provider has to inform you, which they do even if you block it.

Lucidlethargy,

I don’t believe you’re correct about this. Corporations love your take here, though. They absolutely have entire teams of lawyers that push this narrative as best they can.

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

The law still allows me to control what appears on my device

tyler, (edited )

Edit: here’s the EFF agreeing with me. If you don’t read any of the below then you should still read this. eff.org/…/clicks-bind-ways-users-agree-online-ter…

——-

That’s literally absolutely unequivocally incorrect. I have no clue why you think that but even a cursory glance at Wikipedia would have shown you you’re incorrect. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_service

If you want more information you can go ahead and read up on GDPR or one of the numerous other laws around the world stating exactly the opposite of what you’re saying.

Here’s some links for you.

…yola.com/…/360011549640-Creating-GDPR-compliant-…

www.contractscounsel.com/t/us/terms-of-service

And if you had actually watched the Louis Rossman video someone linked below, he literally discusses these things.

I’m sorry but you’re just completely wrong.

CaptPretentious,

Considering many internet providers now have bandwidth caps, it is my policy do not allow arbitrary data on my network (aka ads). It’s also my policy that my policy supersedes any arbitrary terms of services. And that any platform accessing my network henceforth retroactively accepts my policy and terms of service.

LemmyIsFantastic, (edited )

Then don’t use YouTube. Go find another provider giving out content for free.

This is digital sovereign citizen bullshit. You were informed and it’s your call to accept or reject.

astronought,

The sense of self-entitlement is high on Lemmy

maynarkh,

You could send that in a HTTP header, with the stipulation that the server responding would accept the terms.

phoneymouse,

“By responding to this request, you implicitly accept my terms and conditions.”

DavidGarcia, in Conjuring one up like it's nothing

My opinions are too strong for you, traveler.

Stovetop, in You do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?

BY ACCESSING THIS SITE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOUTUBE (HEREBY REFERRED TO AS THE “PLATFORM”) HAS THE ABILITY TO FORCE YOU (HEREBY REFERRED TO AS THE “SCHMUCK”) TO AGREE IN PROXY TO ANY ABSURD CONDITION THE PLATFORM DECIDES, AMENDABLE AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE, AND WITH STIPULATION THAT THE SCHMUCK MAY NEVER EVER CHALLENGE THE PLATFORM IN COURT OR EVEN LOOK AT THE PLATFORM THE WRONG WAY WHILE WALKING BY ONE ANOTHER IN THE HALL, LEST IT HURT THE PLATFORM’S FEELINGS.

MentalEdge, in You do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?
@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz avatar

You can reject cookies, not the TOS. You agree to the TOS of services by simply using them.

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

Not in the EU you don’t

MentalEdge,
@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz avatar

Well, you do. But the EU has a bunch of sanity check laws that make basically all of them non-binding.

Such as any agreement too long for anyone to actually read, being moot.

But YT makes it pretty clear they don’t want you blocking ads, that might actually make that specific part one of the few things that would stand up in court.

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

Well they can try to sue me for blocking ads. See how that goes

Exusia, in You do know you can just click the "reject all" button, right?
@Exusia@lemmy.world avatar

I agreed to it because there’s no real competition for content, so they own the market by default. If you don’t hit “I agree” to every last stipulation, data provision, and term you dont have access to the the largest library of information, shitposting, and weaponised opinions since dawn of radio or television.

I don’t agree with it. So adblock stays.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #