programmer_humor

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

NigelFrobisher, in no.. just no

Needs JSON embedded in the elements because JSON is best practice.

rimjob_rainer, in “It’s not that hard”

Tell me you don’t know shit about programming without telling me you don’t know shit about programming.

some_guy, in “It’s not that hard”

When stupid people wanna sound smart.

KeenFlame, in “It’s not that hard”

What the actual fuck is this guy saying

Who does he think pretending to know programming will get him clout

Literally the richest man on our planet

Does not understand that real programmers exist and will fact check him on bullshit

In what world is it a good choice to poison your own credibility for looking smart

Idiotic

1rre, in “It’s not that hard”

I mean OCaml… But the issue is more the monkeys bashing out the language wanting to A. set a type for their exported function and B. know what type whatever function they’re using is supposed to take so it doesn’t randomly break as they gave it some random type that was formerly compatible

MinekPo1, in Rust project startup kit
@MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml avatar

to be fair , making a simple os is a fun side project , though I would recommend going with a toy VM rather than actual hardware

Zoboomafoo, in What you are according to you fav language

Labview?

aseriesoftubes, in “It’s not that hard”

Shut the fuck up, Lonny. You’re out of your element.

spez, in What you are according to you fav language

I thought javascript would be something like maniac but this is fine too.

Assman, (edited ) in “It’s not that hard”
@Assman@sh.itjust.works avatar

1 == “1”

It’s not that hard

cupcakezealot, (edited ) in “It’s not that hard”
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

starting to see why twitter breaks every day since elon bought it

elon is basically chip morehead from the chipadmin episode of sales guy vs web dude

Alivrah, in “It’s not that hard”

Press X (formerly Twitter) to Doubt

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/52938d9e-513b-4b85-87fe-6ea96f13dc91.png

Deiv, in When you forget to set a boundary conditions in your logic

You’re special, #6,211,583

🤣

cryptosporidium140, in “It’s not that hard”

DAT ASS

Thorry84, in “It’s not that hard”

Yes the compiler/interpreter can figure it out on the fly, that’s what we mean by untyped languages. And as stated both have their merits and their faults.

Elon doesn’t know what the words mean and just chimes in with his AI future BS.

hemmes,
@hemmes@lemmy.world avatar

Even in untyped can’t you explicitly set your type either with declarations or wrapping the value in quotes for a string or something?

projectmoon,

Depends on the language. There is no explicit typing in JavaScript, for example. That’s why Typescript was invented.

EinfachUnersetzlich,

Not always.

hemmes,
@hemmes@lemmy.world avatar

Ah, that could be problematic

janAkali, (edited )

Yes the compiler/interpreter can figure it out on the fly, that’s what we mean by untyped languages.

Are there untyped languages? You probably meant ‘dynamically typed languages’.

But even statically typed languages can figure out most types for you from the context - it’s called ‘type inference’.

Blue_Morpho,

And as stated both have their merits and their faults.

Yes! Just because a compiler could guess the type doesn’t mean it should. Elon didn’t understand the meme at all.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • programmer_humor@programming.dev
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #