It’s commonly accepted by most people that don’t watch My Little Pony, that the grown ass men that do watch MLP, and always hyper obsess over it, may be subtly indicating that they are into other children’s things.
Wouldn’t it be more logical to suggest that idolisation of a children’s pony show is more of a front for a furry? Or is it because the show is created for children, if an adult likes it they’re a pedophile?
I always assumed MLP fans were closer to furries. The show is about horses, not kids?
Fair point. Kinda makes me just as moronic doesn’t it?
If he ever wants to explain his reasoning, I’m happy to hear it. Even if it’s just to get an opposing perspective. FWIW, Ive never seen MLP and couldn’t care less who watches it.
i'd rather be a furry than a paedophile, but i'd rather be dead than be either
but that's not helpful and as you asked reasonably, it's more gut feeling than reasoning, but since i'm here i'll try to reason it out. MLP obsessives like your man here, i'm not talking about e.g. parents who watch it with their kids and think it's ok, keeps 'em quiet, kills the time etc, but people like uis who reply unprompted with pony spam if not seriously disturbed themselves are part of a community full of seriously disturbed people
take those image links, the images are hosted at derpicdn.net which if you navigate directly to it resolves to derpibooru.org. on the face of it not all that alarming but this will assuage only the most casual observer. if you use the filters link on the header and choose 'everything' [1] (not selected by default) and return to the homepage you will see some severely foul shit.
if you then go to 'all time top scoring' [2] you will see what is popular amongst these harmless cartoon enjoyers. the ponies, being designed for children, are childlike in appearance and can be seen displaying their imagined pony genitals, sucking pony dicks and getting fucked. bronies like uis post harmless images like those in the thread above but those images are found amongst several thousands of stills and animations of them which are rather less harmless. visit the links below to verify, or don't, i'm going away to delete my history and wish i never started to reply to this bullshit in the first place
Nobody wants you here, and I suspect nobody else has ever wanted you anywhere else either. Please spill back into the sewers with the rest of the waste.
I’m also a meat eater but have to disagree with you there. I prefer variety because eating the same salty slop gets boring. Maybe you have abused your tastebuds . If you take a break from certain foods it recalibrates the taste buds.
Maybe you just need to find the right veggies or the right seasoning. I wouldn’t say I love veggies more or less than a burger, but they add much needed variety.
I can only remember that my feathered friends are surviving along with me, we care for each other, and I hope freeing them of hunger, disease and predation is a worthy exchange.
No! Salt kills you, cooking kills vitamins and when you think you do everything right, then your vegetables don’t have good enough quality and don’t have enough nutritients. Eating healthy means to suffer, deal with it!!! /s
My wife grew up with terrible cooks. So did I, but I learned to cook to make my own food, she resorted to microwaves, frozen pizzas, and 2 (in my opinion extremely bland but will never say because she was super happy to make it for me) dishes she figured out.
Since being with me, she has figured out she likes chicken, salmon and tilapia, medium steak, a few vegetables, and quite a few other things. Her parents UNDERCOOKED chicken and seafood, made steak into charcoal or still bloody with no in between which made her not trust any pink, and they boiled the everloving shit out of every vegetable until peas were mush and broccoli looked like it was rotting.
They also never had real mayonnaise, and she only ever had miracle whip and thought she hated mayo.
And tea was always super weak and filled with sugar, so she never had real tea until she tried mine one day and went “I thought you said this was tea?”
Total speculation: I think the reason so many of our parents suck at cooking is because they didn’t learn before having kids, and when it came time to either spend shitloads on carryout or figure out cooking, they just remembered the basic ingredients from their own childhood, but we’re never around for the spices or cook times. And since internet wasn’t really a “I need a recipe, let me google that on my phone real quick” until much later, it was that or find a cookbook with all your favorite recipes.
I believe the idea is that, because his reaction to a pumpkin pleading for help was to stab it to death, that either he discovered something about himself and couldn’t handle it, or that he was exposed to be a crazy killer type.
As a lazy person who grew up with a parent who’s method of cooking vegetables was just “boil it till its grey!”, if a vegetable can be eaten raw, I will be eating it raw.
Raw broccoli dipped in garlic greek yoghurt is delicious, nutritious and fast/lazy to prepare.
I’m on the hunt for a vegan alternative that is decent, but until then, crunchy carrots and sugar snap peas are my go-to lazy veggies.
Maybe it’s because I’m on prescription probiotics and digestive enzymes, but I haven’t noticed a drastic change in my farts from the broccoli. They used to absolutely reek before I went low-dairy and started being a little more mindful of FODMAPS.
Now pea protein powder? that amplifies my flatulence to war crime levels.
Asking someone else to graph data for you to analyze is a disrespectful misunderstanding of how data analysis work.
The person graphing is doing the data analysis. They have to, at some level, to make the data presentable. If you are incapable of doing that, and your contribution is to be fully reliant on what they graph so you can look at what they make and go “huh yeah line does go up” you aren’t useful. They can tweak the data to say many things, and you wouldn’t understand it happened.
You can definitely analyze a graph/chart, but unless you need help understanding a more complex representation, there’s not much you can argue with. Even if you know of a bias in it, they can just make up something about avoiding another bias or increasing focus on an area
Maybe it depends on the domain, but I think it is perfectly reasonable both to ask or produce graphs to show data trends, qualitative behavior, relative rates, etc. I mean, looking at one chart and acting like you know better than the analyst might be a duck move but wanting the chart isn't.
Imagine if scientific papers didn't use plots to visualize data?
comicstrips
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.