People who advocate against animal cruelty are a special kind of stupid. Totally destructive of any (fundamentally not so bad) businesses that give time the time of day, and utterly ineffective at actually meaningfully changing the mass cruelty of the meat industry. Absolutely catastrophic virtue signaling. PETA “shelters” have a higher kill (euthanasia) rate than any other organization.
What the fuck are you try to say? Because one bad organization does bad things, no one can say we should move away from torturing animals for extra profit?
If you actually care about animals dying in kill shelters the solutions are to open more shelters, do more to stop abusive conditions for animals before they get out of hand, and most importantly stop breeding animals. Animals are killed either because shelters don’t want to take them in do to their condition or they are too full. You can blame the no kill shelters as well, because they don’t take in every animal. But they aren’t really to blame either, people who support the industries that breed pets are.
How is it virtue signalling? That’s when someone brags verbally about their position or perspective based on social expectations.
Based on your use of the word “destructive” I assume you’re talking about radical animal activists like the ones who sabotage industrial meat factories, often secretly and anonymously for their own safety.
So, do you really think these really are people who are ineffectual and desiring social reaffirmation of their views? If anything, this group of individuals are exactly those I would call to mind as ones who are not afraid to make actual change in the world they want to see, whatever it takes. Forget if you agree with them or not. It seems absurd to call them ineffective virtue-signallers.
utterly ineffective at actually meaningfully changing the mass cruelty of the meat industry.
There should be no “meat industry” at all you despicable fucking ghoul
“fundamentally not so bad” ? you morally bankrupt imbecile, go watch Dominion
Stop murdering and eating sentient beings
PETA “shelters” have a higher kill (euthanasia) rate than any other organization.
Close to a million cows are murdered daily (not to mention pigs, ducks, etc.) - almost universally after a life of torture or soon after birth - but yeah, sure, shelters kill more, makes total sense
Since you obviously feel guilty (consciously or not) but do not seem to have the basic morality to stop profiting from the mass torture and killing of sentient beings for your personal pleasure, at least have the decency to keep quiet about it instead of trying to jump through logical hoops justifying yourself
It’s more the fact that this movement spends all its energy shutting down Fois Gras and Angora and has had ZERO impact on the wholesale slaughter of sentient beings across the meat industry except to shift a growing portion from farms in the US and Europe where there are some meager standards to farms in asia that have zero scruples and will torture without reserve to make an extra juan.
Fucking useless caricature of activism. All your outrage would be more effectively spent on literally anything else.
It’s not “no point in opposing polution because china would”
It’s literally the same people and they are providing a service that YOU consume (whatever form lf food you eat, any shit you buy off amazon, the car you drive, the phone you use, etc…) all you have said is “it’s fine if you pollute as long as you do not do it in front of me” “it’s fine if you torture animals if it’s not in front of me”
99% of musicals completely obliterate my suspension of disbelief. Like why? Why did you have to force songs into every single conversation? It’s weird and unnatural
Soooo completely misunderstand my country’s existing economy and ecology, make a bunch of boneheaded decisions, then proceed to murder tens of millions with my dictatorship in the name of “modernization” while creating one of the most oppressive, least politically free governments in human history?
Am I really listening to music if I don’t experience tonal whiplash with each song? Is it really living if I’m not listening to a j-pop song only to have post-metal be next in the queue??
Not only that but I also just get a real good grasp on the music I listen to in general. It is a very fun excerisze to be able to guess the song that’s playing within the first few seconds.
See, I’m typically the same way. Recently though I’ve been messing around with how I store my music though and have been into (shuffling or playing in order) albums recently.
It’s probably not logistically viable, but as a matter of principle, there is absolutely no reason why DPRK couldn’t host to world cup. It’s gone to plenty of worse countries.
10G Base LR: It's a type of fiber standard that runs a 10 gigabits. and looks like this
QSFP 40G: It's a DIFFERENT type of fiber standard that runs at 40 gigs and looks like this
I only know the basics of fiber networking but I know that different standards are needed because light refracts differently depending on cable thickness and composition, so standards/variations of the same standard have different maximum length, bandwidth, collision detection, etc.
For example, the type of fiber that you use to connect two offices that are 10 miles apart is going to be very different than the fiber you use to connect your SAN storage to your baremetal ESXI servers.
In essence, OP is asking if he can connect his phone line to the port on the back of the computer, and the answer is "Yes, but it's not that simple, and you probably don't want to do that anyways"
The image shows a post from a platform or forum, likely named “Lemmy,” where a user with the handle “ky56” is asking a technical question related to networking.
Here’s a breakdown of the technical terms:
10GBase-LR: This refers to a specific standard of Ethernet transceiver module that can support data rates of up to 10 Gbps (Gigabits per second) and works over single-mode fiber. The “LR” in the name stands for “Long Range,” indicating that this module is designed for longer distance transmissions, typically up to 10 kilometers.
QSFP-40G-LR4: “QSFP” stands for Quad Small Form-factor Pluggable. It’s a compact, hot-pluggable transceiver used for data communications applications. The “40G” indicates its data rate, which is 40 Gbps. The “LR4” suggests it’s designed for long-range transmissions, typically up to 10 kilometers, and it uses a 4-lane architecture.
CWDM: Stands for Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing. It’s a technology that multiplexes multiple optical signals on a single fiber by using different wavelengths (i.e., colors) of laser light. This technique enables multiple channels to be transmitted over a single fiber, increasing the overall capacity of the communication link.
The user’s question is about whether they can connect a 10GBase-LR module to a QSFP-40G-LR4 module using CWDM technology. Essentially, they’re asking if it’s possible to interconnect these two types of transceivers, which operate at different data rates, using a technology that allows multiple wavelengths on a single fiber.
Yeah but it didn’t answer the question of “can you connect them?”.
Others in this thread have said yes but chat gpt ignored the question and replied with a description of the question. It’s easy for a model like this to determine what a model name means(it seems complicated to humans but there is a logic to their naming).
That’s because I asked it to explain the technical aspect of the question, not answer it.
Here’s the answer it gave me when I asked it to answer the question:
Yes, I can provide an answer to the technical question in the photo.
The question is: “Can I attach a 10GBase-LR to QSFP-40G-LR4 (CWDM)?”
Answer: In general, you can’t directly connect a 10GBase-LR transceiver to a QSFP-40G-LR4 transceiver because they operate at different data rates (10 Gbps vs. 40 Gbps). Additionally, the QSFP-40G-LR4 typically uses four separate lanes of 10 Gbps each, which is why it has the “4” in its name.
However, there are solutions to bridge these differences:
Breakout Cables: You can use a 40G QSFP+ to 4x 10G SFP+ breakout cable. This cable will split the 40G signal from the QSFP-40G-LR4 into four separate 10G channels. You can then connect one of the 10G channels to your 10GBase-LR module. This will only utilize 10 Gbps of the 40 Gbps available from the QSFP+ port, leaving the other three channels unused.
Transponder or Media Converter: These devices can convert signals between different data rates. A transponder could take in the 10G signal from the 10GBase-LR and output it as one lane of a 40G signal compatible with the QSFP-40G-LR4. However, similar to the breakout cable, this will only utilize a fraction of the 40G capability.
Switch/Router Configuration: Some high-end networking equipment allows you to configure the data rate of specific ports. If both transceivers are plugged into such a device, you could potentially configure the QSFP-40G-LR4 port to operate at 10G, but this would be vendor and model specific.
Regarding the CWDM component, if both transceivers support CWDM and are operating on compatible wavelengths, they should be able to communicate over a CWDM system. However, CWDM is typically used to combine multiple signals onto a single fiber, so if you’re just trying to connect these two transceivers, the CWDM component may not be necessary unless it’s part of a larger network design.
Always consult with the documentation of your networking equipment and, if possible, conduct tests in a lab environment before making any changes to a live network.
You probably want to simplify your example to “the servers you’d connect in the same room” rather than going into “SAN” and “ESXI” or else they only people who will understand are going to be all the /r/homelab refugees in c/selfhosted, and they already all taken what this was about anyway lol
It's a meme. This image shows a lemmy user asking a highly technical question and a caption saying that that is the least technical user, implying that all other lemmy users are even more technical.
memes
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.