movies

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

randon31415, in Gen Z is turned off by onscreen sex, wants no-mance over romance, a new study finds

Oppenheimer: A man intertwined with US nuclear policy, both when creating the first nuke, and during the cold war. Political intrigue mixed with science!

Execs: “What if it had a sex scene?”

Wolf_359,

Execs (apparently): What if we chose to explore his flaws by showing that he had an extramarital affair?"

Puritans: This biopic should really only show his other flaws. And political intrigue. Sex wouldn’t make sense in an R rated film.

TheBat,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

One of many extramarital affairs apparently.

Mchugho,

That scene was to show just how uncomfortable and vulnerable Robert Oppenheimer was having his intimate life pursued. It was supposed to be jarring.

It’s not the fault of studio execs that you are literally incapable of interpreting the subtext of that scene.

TheBat,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

Imagine thinking Nolan listens to execs when making movies. That hasn’t been the case since The Dark Knight.

Also, Oppenheimer was a known womanizer.

UnderpantsWeevil,
@UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world avatar

What if we had a sex scene in the middle of a board meeting?

Every member of the executive board high fiving and wolf whistling

bigkahuna1986, in Netflix Packs on More Than 13 Million Subscribers in Q4, Well Above Expectations

Netflix was greatly rewarded for enshittification, so I expect they’ll only get worse and other companies with follow suit.

Gigan,
@Gigan@lemmy.world avatar

Hopefully some of the other streaming services die and there will be some consolidation.

Fandangalo,

That’s just going back to cable. 🙃

mundane,

When I see the word cable, my mind goes to linear tv. A consolidated streaming service would be vastly superior to the consolidated linear tv packages of old cable.

Fandangalo,

It’s a fair point. I was talking moreso about just generalized bundling. I think both are accurate.

Naja_Kaouthia, in Nicolas Cage Ready To Quit Doing Movies: “Maybe Three Or Four More”
@Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world avatar

I will probably watch anything he’s in out of sheer morbid curiosity.

KISSmyOS,

Bangkok Dangerous is a goddamn masterpiece, and I’m willing to die on this hill.

driving_crooner, (edited )
@driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br avatar

Recentlish movie with him that I really enjoyed:

Mandy (2018): Slasher/LSD infused terror movie excellently acted by Cage (that scream at the bathroom is a delight), with a really interesting cinematography.

Color of out space (2019): I don’t remember a lot about this one, except that scene at the kitchen.

Pig (2021): seek and revenge thriller that would make you cry.

The unbearable weight of massive talent (2022): funny action movie, Pedro Pascal steal the spotlight, but Cage doesn’t get behind.

livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

Pig was a masterpiece. Mandy is insane.

I enjoyed him as Dracula in Renfield recently - my mini review here.

JJROKCZ,

I also enjoyed Renfield, didn’t go into it with a lot of expectations and left happy with my decision after having some good laughs

driving_crooner,
@driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br avatar

Noted, I’m watching it this weekend.

livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

@driving_crooner cool! The plot is terrible but the film's a lot of fun.

WarmSoda,

Color out of space is great. It’s just a family dealing with a little cosmic horror for the weekend.

Algaroth, (edited )

I don’t remember a lot about this one, except that scene at the kitchen.

That is such a Cage movie summary it should be on the cover. Sold me on it.

So many of his movies have the effect you end up wondering whether you fell asleep during it and dreamt some of it.

PissinSelfNdriveway, in Gen Z is turned off by onscreen sex, wants no-mance over romance, a new study finds

Well no shit. Nobody wants to watch sex scenes with their parents, and when rent costs 3 used cars per month they don’t have a ton of choice.

PowerGloveSoBad,

I think you are exaggerating a bit here. Rent levels are skyrocketing past wage growth, sure, but have you considered that used cars are also getting prohibitively expensive relative to the average income? Three of them would be roughly a zillion dollars if my math is correct

PissinSelfNdriveway,

Well if you people would stop buying your Pepsis and Cosmo magazines then maybe you could afford a 2001 dodge neon … Dammit

vaultdweller013,

Ya can get a used early 2000s/late 90s saburban in my city for about $2000. Mind ya folks trade around cars here like a 1700s brothel traded the clap but still.

Son_of_dad, (edited ) in ‘Superman: Legacy’: Nicholas Hoult Lands Role Of Lex Luthor

The Luthor they haven’t done on film yet is my favorite, the Luthor who is physically fit, super intelligent, successful, charming.

Luthor was the pinnacle of what a human could be. Like ozymandias in watchmen. His name is Alexander, and he is supposed to be a modern day namesake. He is the perfect human, who is almost destined to be a world leader, then suddenly Superman appears, and can fly without effort, making Luthor who worked his ass off #2

Then Luthor finds out supes is an alien. Luthor believes that it is his human right to rule over earth if he is capable, and an alien has no right to stop him. If Superman had appeared in ancient times, would be have stopped Alexander, or Caesar or Augustus, would he have had the right to interfere in human affairs to that extent? Luthor went mad when Superman appeared, and won’t stop till he’s dead.

I like this take off Luthor as a xenophobe who thinks Superman, an immigrant has no business stopping his rise to power

Shyfer,

I like it because you could see how it could be convincing if you didn’t know him. And I always figured that’s how it is with both Lex Luthor and Doom, they sound like good guys to the people they manipulate, but their motivations are based on pure ego.

bloopernova,
@bloopernova@programming.dev avatar

I’m bummed out that the post-Endgame Marvel stuff has been fumbled so often, because it means we get less chance of great villains.

Magneto and Doom are of course amazing characters, but there’s also the Sentinels/mastermold/Trask and all the great X-Men villains.

greenskye, in Gen Z is turned off by onscreen sex, wants no-mance over romance, a new study finds

How does Gen Z feel about nudity in films? Either nudity that fits the scene and feels logical or nudity just for fan service?

I’m cool if your just not a fan of shoe horned in and cringey sex scenes, but lots of younger folks come off as weirdly puritanically prudish to me. Why are we so much more comfortable with casual violence than casual nudity? That bothers me.

SasquatchBanana,

I feel like Gen Z are very conservative when it comes to sex and nudity and not just in films. The amount of swerfs and “sex positive” individuals is staggering.

klemptor,

Oh I’m gonna hate myself for asking this but wtf is a swerf

alekwithak,

Sex worker-exclusionary radical feminist, apparently.

SasquatchBanana,

Sex-worker Exclusionary Radical Feminists. They are individuals who are against sex work and workers to the point of sexual confinement. From my experience, most are sex negative, puritanical, and end up supporting policies that increase abuse.

klemptor,

Jesus christ. I’m learning that anything ending in “ERF” is probably something I’m not gonna like.

SCB,

Gen Z in the macro sense is a very prudish generation. It’s weird because they clad themselves in sex-positivity, and are conceptually pro-sexuality, but individually are often quite prudish and reserved.

Very broad brush, of course.

hanekam,

Isn’t this just typical of how young people are?

SCB,

This is very different from my personal lives experience, and those of most people I know, but again my entire point here is that I don’t really know the current experience of young people.

All I have is a really broad brush.

rwhitisissle,

Short answer: no. Long answer: also, no.

Meowoem,

I wonder to what extent that it could be an observation bias? genZ are very online and very used to having a public persona that’s safe and detached - it’s very true that online most genZ seem almost corporate, they’re less likely to say something wild than the Wendy’s lady.

When I think of the ones I actually interact with personally very few of them are like that, obviously this is likely to be selection bias but in person or private conversation they’re very different to their social media persona.

They’re a very nervous and shy generation because they’ve been so in the spotlight on social media, their parents are generally at least internet aware too so it’s not like the private world it was for us. I wonder if they’re just more used to guarding their statements.

cricket97,

because sex and violence are not really comparable

rwhitisissle,

It’s a genuinely fascinating topic and I kind of want to see if there’s any research on why this is the case.

SgtAStrawberry,

As a Gen Z I wonder the exact same thing, and that violence seemsto be better than nudity bothes me too.

Personally I’m perfectly fine with nudity in media be it fitting or fan service.

If something bothers me about nude scenes or sex scenes for that matter, it isn’t about the nudity or sex in of it self, but more so that extremely shoehornd in romance and sex just because it has to happen if a male and female lead or support, spends any amount of time together.

I really hate that sort of practice and I much more prefer a crime movie with two friends as the main characters. Over the same crime movie but now they have to be in love, because one of them happened to be a woman. Of it’s a good love story or it makes sense I buy it, but more of the time it really doesn’t.

And as this is a very common trope in movies, this dose lead to me choosing movie that doesn’t feature romance or sex at all. Because that is easier than trying to find one that doesn’t just shoehorn the stuff in for the sack of it.

fosforus,

or fan service.

I don’t get this. Why is fan service fine? I thought it’s as vapid as graituous sex.

SCB,

Things are allowed to just be fun.

fosforus,

Like graituous sex?

SCB,

Yes, though the word “gratuitous” is a bit loaded, but I understand that’s just common parlance.

GONADS125, in Marvel Fans React To Martin Scorsese’s ‘Killers Of The Flower Moon’

“Rooting for the Osage would be much easier if they had a hero on their side like Captain America.”

There is such an elegance to The Onion’s satire hahaha.

HawlSera, in Gen Z is turned off by onscreen sex, wants no-mance over romance, a new study finds

Actually I think they have the same problem with it we Millennials do, and that we don’t find it Charming when a guy acts like a total creep and is rewarded for it because the movie was written by total creeps. Or if our lead is a woman, I’m tired of hearing about how successful and fulfilled she is with her brilliant career that no one takes seriously, because she hasn’t found the right man yet, but then she does and discovers that all of her problems are solved by his penis. Because those movies are also made by creeps

Syringe,

I was thinking this too. Also, not EVERYTHING needs to have a love story jammed into it. There are so many situations that you can tell they shoehorned one in in order to pull a specific demo and it’s totally not necessary for the story

ThatFembyWho, in Gen Z is turned off by onscreen sex, wants no-mance over romance, a new study finds

First of all. Are there any stories without sex/romance? I personally would love the occasional platonic story. About people who aren’t all trying to get in eachothers pants.

I’m not Gen Z (Millenial) but I do get tired of being bombarded with sex, making out, etc. If it’s done well and integral to the plot, then it’s fine. But honestly less is more. Do I really need a camera to closeup pan the full length of someone’s naked body to realize what’s going on? After a while it just gets weird, like I am legit waching porn here, am I supposed to be aroused?

The other problem is how flawless they look. I wouldn’t mind seeing some real, average looking people for a change. Hold hands or awkwardly kiss after knowing eachother a few months or years, not like “oh hi we just met and it’s the two of us alone how convenient hehe guess there’s nothing left to do but use our perfect bodies for totally fake sex”.

Has anyone ever had sex and thought afterwards, wow that was just like TV/movies/whatever? In my experience it’s both more awkward and way hotter. They’re not going to script all the little things we enjoy in reality…

TSG_Asmodeus,

First of all. Are there any stories without sex/romance?

Alien and Aliens stand out, and as the poster below said, Dredd as well.

evranch,

Are there any stories without sex/romance?

Dredd 2012. Judge Dredd takes on a female apprentice Anderson for a training day. They mop the floor with gangsters and crooked cops. It’s a non-stop action thrill ride.

No romance. No sexual tension. They do their jobs.

TSG_Asmodeus,

Dredd 2012. Judge Dredd takes on a female apprentice Anderson for a training day. They mop the floor with gangsters and crooked cops. It’s a non-stop action thrill ride.

I absolutely love the part when Dredd is extremely injured and basically walking wounded, Anderson saves him from being executed, and it’s the perfect time for the Hollywood ‘Anderson nurses Dredd back from near death.’

But what happens? Dredd just field dresses himself, and it’s not romantic, at all. She literally covers him while he does it, and then they move on.

pelerinli,

Are there* any stories without sex/romance?

There can be. But what if that made you to look other problems of the life? Like poverty and misguided education to help capitalism or like health problems caused by environmental changes or war for drug money? That is why they stick to the emotional side of humans, love of a partner or care of a parent.

Rokk,

Space Jam

IHaveTwoCows,

For some reason Hollywood thinks we need sex scenes even though some of the greatest films of all time have none, especially in the sci-fi/horror genre… Alien, The Thing, Event Horizon, E.T., Predator, all of the MCU, etc

CurlyMoustache,
@CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world avatar

What TV-series is this: «Tits and dragons»

Peddlephile,

Doom, Event Horizon, Hereditary, Silence of the Lambs, The Big Short, Frank… There’s heaps of movies out there for us people who steer well clear of romance. They’re just not mainstream and I’m fine with that.

The only romance movies I really like are The Wedding Singer, 50 First Dates and the 1995 Pride and Prejudice series. I think it’s because the characters actually have depth and are fun to watch.

PhlubbaDubba, in Nintendo has officially announced a live-action 'Legend of Zelda' movie.

If link says even a word the whole thing will be ruined

kromem,

Starring Timothy Chalamet as Link

paholg,

Well, excuse me princess.

youtu.be/qzfXxkHrIBM?si=iYZMohadaZG1hXsb

frezik,

Link talks. The fan theory that he’s mute is unsupportable. Too many instances of him conveying complex information to people he just met (and who wouldn’t know his gesture language). You can try to explain it away, but it will quickly get more complicated than assuming he talks.

PhlubbaDubba,

Hear me out, sign language

Those exchanges usually involve link gesturing with his hands when he’s explicitly communicating with someone else

frezik,

Is this sign language universally known in Hyrule? Why don’t we see anyone else using it?

That seems a bigger leap than just assuming he talks.

Stovetop, in Paramount, Warner Bros Discovery are in early talks to merge

Can we just stop with the megacorp bullshit? Can regulators just please take a step back and look at how much has been ruined by all of these merges and buyouts?

The Warner-Discovery merger never even should have happened in the first place. It was a disaster that ended up making things worse for customers and creators alike. And now they want more?

Fuck off with this noise. What will it take for us to resurrect Teddy Roosevelt so he can go to town with the ol’ trust busting stick?

dangblingus, in Box Office: ‘The Marvels’ Gets Grounded With MCU’s Second-Lowest Opening Day Ever

Who is actually going to all of these Marvel movies? I thought everyone came to the same conclusion that Marvel started sucking noticeably immediately after Endgame.

c0mbatbag3l,
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah even the filler shit up to endgame was questionable, I just assumed they’d stop making them after that. Now you have a TV show to watch as homework so you can understand the movies.

Do people seriously have the time to waste to just watch superhero shit endlessly? There’s only so many ways you can write the same premise.

CaptainHowdy,

Marvel has been writing new stories in the genre (what you’re calling “the same premise”) for like 6 times longer than the MCU has been around. And they have more story arcs to deal with than the simplified MCU stuff.

Sure it’s not all great, but I don’t think there’s any shortage of possibilities within the genre.

Evotech,

It’s something to do.

SchizoDenji,

Endgame sucked too. It was just fanservicr with shit Cgi and interchangeable characters quipping.

BURN,

I said from release day that Infinity War was the better movie. Endgame is good because it’s the culmination of 10+ years of movies, it wasn’t a good movie on its own. It wasn’t necessarily bad imo, but it was a step down from IW

Fades, (edited )

I don’t go so therefore nobody does

Have you seen what comic fans will consume over very long time periods, good or bad? It’s almost like there are plenty of marvel fans that still watch even if it’s not Oscar worthy

RaoulDook,

I don’t go to any of the movies in the theater but I watch a lot of them on my nice big TV at home.

They are a hell of a lot more interesting than the average boring TV show about Cops, Judges, Doctors, and Lawyers. Maybe there should be a superhero that combines all those like Dr Cop Judge, Attorney at Law and Private Investigator for Hire. Judge Dredd wasn’t enough.

dzire187,

me. I’ve been watching most of the movies, a lot of them at the theater. it’s always been entertaining.

And the Loki series has been a blast, both sessions

Vespair,

I’m a comic fan and I’ve watched all of them, and will continue. The problem people are having is they’re expecting these movies to be like movies instead of comics, but the MCU has been thinking like comics for a long time now. Just like in comics, not every issue is going to be some enormous crossover event with huge stakes and universe-shifting impact. Most comics are character series issues, where the A plot is just some fun excuse for the hero to do cool shit and have a little bit of character growth. Comics are literally soap operas for boys and nerds, and that’s what makes them great. The same applies here. Ya’ll are attempting to compare X-Factor issue to The Death of Captain Marvel, but those were never comparable things and they were never meant to be. If you go in to these films expecting X-Factor issue instead, you might be able to enjoy these films for the non-serious popcorn media they’re meant to be.

BURN,

This is the disconnect

I want movies, I never liked comic books. Others want comic books and weren’t huge movie fans. Disney hasn’t committed to either and it’s not working.

I know I’ve stopped caring about the MCU entirely since Endgame. I’m really not interested in this comic style storytelling, just like I wasn’t as a kid.

Vespair,

And that’s fine. But why assume all media has to be for you? These are comic films from a comic company; if you weren’t ever into comic books why assume you’d be into these?

BURN,

Because historically they’ve been for audiences like me, and now that they’re not, they’re wondering where everyone went. I assumed I’d enjoy these because I’ve enjoyed previous marvel movies, but I can’t name a single (marvel) movie since NWH that I’ve enjoyed. It’s been a massive shift in their movies that can’t be ignored.

They weren’t originally this comic book like up until just before endgame (coincidentally when everyone started to think the quality of the content is trending down)

Vespair,

No, they were, it’s just that by the time people got on board we were past the issue cycle and were onto the event cycle, so people got used to the incline and expected that that was going to be how these went: endless incline in excitement. But that was all the Infinity War lead up and climax. Now we’re in the lull leading into the next build-up cycle. We’re back at the Thor through Guardians 1 stage of the cycle, basically.

BURN,

I really don’t think that’s the case.

Going back to watch any of the Phase 1 movies is such a better experience than any of the Phase 4 or Phase 5 movies. There doesn’t need to be endless excitement, there just needs to be decent writing, and that’s missing from anything new. Nobody cares about any of the new characters.

There’s never been a huge number of flops from marvel with people losing more and more interest in watching them. There’s no clear plan forward, as their planned “Thanos” scale villain has been in hot water irl and will likely not be able to continue to play the character.

Vespair,

I can’t speak to anyone else’s experience, but I personally care about the MCU Shang-Chi, Kate Bishop, Yelena, Monica, Kamala, Moon Knight, hell I even care about Stature (Ant-Man’s daughter) a little bit.

As to the “plan forward,” I dunno man, it seems weird to borrow worry by letting speculative futures impact your opinion on and enjoyment of what’s in front of you. Maybe it’s not for you, that’s okay, but it you think it could be for you, I would suggest maybe trying to focus on what’s on the screen rather than caring about what’s happening behind the screen so much.

I’m not a business analyst; I’m not in the speculating market. I’m a media consumer, so I’m going to choose to judge them on their output, not any of the factors surrounding it or the discourse about it. For me, ignoring all the outside noise, I can only think of about 3 MCU-related properties that I watched and did not enjoy myself while watching. That’s all I’m looking for out of this relationship, so as far as I’m concerned they’re still doing right by me.

BURN,

That’s where we differ. I couldnt care less for pretty much any of those characters. Maybe it’s because I’m not the target demographic, but absolutely none of them connected at all with me, they were often just another marvel protagonist who follows the exact same story as all the other ones. That worked in Phase 1, it won’t work now that it’s played out.

Even as far back as Iron Man there was a plan forward. They had some idea of where everything was going, even if the viewers didn’t see it. Currently it looks like they have no ultimate endgame and don’t have any idea what’s happening next.

The on-screen product has been terrible. All of the D+ Shows have been downright horrid and I’ve given up on trying to force myself to watch them to keep up. MoM had me leaving the theater genuinely angry at how bad they fucked up all the characters.

I can’t name a single marvel property that’s landed well since NWH, and NWH was heavily carried by nostalgia. Ant-Man was some spy kids level of terrible, MoM completely ruined a ton of character development, black widow was just bad, and the list keeps going on. There is clearly some larger issues because I know it’s not just myself who feels this way about the current phase.

I’m no longer enjoying the content because of the poor writing and extremely shallow characters. And it may be that those elements were present in the original marvel films, but the tropes have been played out so much that they’re predictable.

Superhero fatigue may not be a thing (The Boys/Batman have been great), but there sure is Marvel fatigue

Vespair,

Don’t know what to tell you friend, my opinion is nearly entirely opposite yours. But I’m not trying to convince you to like Marvel, as I’ve hinted at before, if comics weren’t for you why assume comic movies would be? I was only trying to answer dangblingus’s question “Who is actually going to all of these Marvel movies?” Me, I am.

I’ve been entertained by all of the Disney+ series, with perhaps the exception of Secret Invasion which was pretty rough and superfluous.

I don’t see how any of the characters were fucked up in MoM personally.

NWH is easily one of my least favorite MCU properties as I think it’s an empty film with nothing but fanservice to offer, but even I will concede it has a couple moments that are so good they almost redeem and justify the whole film, so I still like it well enough to not call it “bad.”

Ant-Man wasn’t great, I’ll agree there, but Ant-Man has always been the “family” property in the Marvel deck. Yes, I know these are all “family” films to some degree, but Ant-Man has always been the only active father in the MCU, his films have been the only ones to actively involve a child, and his films have been the ones most filled with goofy gags and humor. So complaining that Ant-Man felt like Spy Kids is a big silly to me, because the Ant-Man series is very much trying to capture a similar segment that the Spy Kids films were.

I thought Black Widow was definitely unnecessary in the “how does this fit into the greater picture” sense, but otherwise was great, and again is very comic book in the sense that sometimes they just publish side origin stories mostly out of continuity. Your complaints about lacking depth feel especially hollow here, as I think Black Widow genuinely focused on adding depth to Natasha (and succeeded) while introducing Yelena in a way that made her feel full, developed, and three-dimensional.

So I’m not sure what you want from these films, but I think they may just not be for you. It’s cool you dipped your toe in the water and had fun with them for awhile, but that doesn’t mean you or anyone else was wronged just because you decided the room wasn’t for you after all. 🤷‍♂️

Whoresradish,

I am. I recognize that many of them are only okay movies, but they have a very high hit ratio and when they get it right it is amazing. GOTG3 and Spiderman NWH were amazing movies. Honestly even the bad movies are still okay. I have to admit several of the tv shows kind of suck and I hope they stop making them.

NOT_RICK, in Marvel Studios' Blade will be rated 'R'
@NOT_RICK@lemmy.world avatar

Good, muthafuckas always tryin to ice skate uphill

stormtrooper,

Hope they keep that line in the new movie

Thermal_shocked, (edited )

I’m just hoping it doesn’t go the way of RoboCop and the total recall remakes. Wesley Snipes is the perfect role for that, basically Hugh Jackman’s wolverine.

Sheeple, in The DCEU ends not with a bang, but a wimper.
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

This is the case for when franchises get milked forever. They CAN’T die on a good note. Good notes is what promotes sequels. Only when they get a low note they start discontinueing.

It’s why most franchise stories seem to end on dissatisfactory cliffhangers

FanciestPants, (edited )

Does Logan count as ending on a high note, or is that just waiting to be sullied by bringing Hugh Jackman back into the franchise?

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

Wouldn’t know. I kinda stopped paying attention lately lol.

jordanlund, (edited )
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

Sometimes it’s not even “forever”. Wonder Woman '84 was only the 2nd film and it shit the bed so hard it not only killed any future WW movie, but it tanked the Star Wars movie the director was supposed to do next.

jpreston2005,

I mean, the first Wonder Woman movie was garbage too so…

But hey the Zack Snyder cut of justice league was pretty dope

jordanlund,
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar

First 2/3rds of Wonder Woman was fine, but it fell apart at the end. WW 84 though, eesh. Bell to bell just trash, except Pedro Pascal who is a joy!

BoastfulDaedra,

Exactly.

This is why I support the MCU going out on a limb with their new stuff. They’re already on a dang limb, so own it. This will happen to them someday, too, and they know it! So when an opportunity comes up to risk everything to go out gloriously and respectably, you take it. If/When they’re lucky, they’ll find something new and squeeze a few more years out of it.

DC never did that without backsliding on it.

It’s decreasing returns. I mean I know we’ve had disney princesses around for nearly a century, but you gotta take basic economics into account in this stuff.

mymanchris, in what are some of the most glaring and significant mistranslations in movies? add spoiler tags if necessary, please.

In John Wick, when he interrogates Francis the bouncer outside the Russian nightclub, John asks him if he’s lost weight. Francis responds, in Russian, “yes, 23 kilograms,” but the subtitle converts it to “over 60 pounds.” This completely destroys the fact that Francis was using code to tell John there were 23 guards inside.

canthidium,
@canthidium@lemmy.world avatar

LMAO, that is quite funny. I mean it’s an accurate translation, but completely messes up the context.

Junkers_Klunker,

It isnt though, 23kg is ~ 50lbs not 60

canthidium,
@canthidium@lemmy.world avatar

Oh, I didn’t check the math, but that’s even funnier.

Varyk,

Oh haha, that one’s great, thanks.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • movies@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #

    Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 20480 bytes) in /var/www/kbin/kbin/vendor/symfony/http-kernel/Profiler/FileProfilerStorage.php on line 171

    Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 143360 bytes) in /var/www/kbin/kbin/vendor/symfony/error-handler/ErrorRenderer/HtmlErrorRenderer.php on line 260