lemmy.today

const_void, to linuxmemes in Just finished setting up my GNOME desktop. Am I doing this right?

Needs more extensions

Deceptichum,
@Deceptichum@kbin.social avatar
qarbone, (edited ) to memes in Honey, are you okay? You've barely touched your breakfast flour...

You got some dry ass biscuits, boi. Biscuits shouldn’t be “really dry”.

ivanafterall,
@ivanafterall@kbin.social avatar

You got some dry ass-biscuits boi.

grue,
Tier1BuildABear,
@Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world avatar

The flour should be though

altima_neo,
@altima_neo@lemmy.zip avatar

And gravy shouldn’t be wet floor. It should be greasy floor.

funktion,

Fatty flour with lots of little burnt bits of meat, emulsified.

InputZero,

Is that how it’s supposed to be? I have had many customers drag me out to breakfast claiming to have the best biscuits and gravy, and it’s always the same tasteless crap. My family in America have too. Are they all just THAT basic?

Lemminnewbie2, to memes in I have bad news for you...

Looks like Chris Ramsay

turbowafflz,

That’s what I thought, is it?

Leviathan,

Sure is.

Aurenkin, to memes in Capitalism really just reinvented sleeping outside SMH

There’s a solid foundation for this idea but I still don’t see it putting a roof over my head to be honest.

Anticorp, to lemmybewholesome in AI will fix everything 😎

All of America’s problems are solved! What a blessed day.

shalafi, to lemmyshitpost in Follow your heart, they said

breed wendigos

Got a couple of acres in the swamp, I could do this. Deadfalls everywhere, just gotta find one in front of sour ground.

“Sometimes dead is bettah.”

Macaroni_ninja, to lemmyshitpost in Your mom coming home after having brunch at the pancake house
@Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world avatar

Amazing, so you just prompt the exact explanation of a joke and AI can generate it?! How convenient and easy to understand! Thanks!

Prunebutt,

When people ask me why AI generated memes are creatively bankrupt, this post is what I’m gonna show them.

ignotum, (edited )

Isn’t low effort AI memes like the pinnacle of shitposting? All the stupid stuff noone could be arsed to make before is now a couple of clicks away

Anyways here’s an all-natural, organically grown, locally sourced shitpost, just for you:

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6873734e-7d79-462b-b731-b91b181608b8.jpeg

Prunebutt,

I still think that “traditional” shitposting has a creative process to it.

ignotum,

Traditional:

  1. Think of shitpost
  2. Photoshop shitpost
  3. Profit

With AI:

  1. Think of shitpost
  2. Generate shitpost image
  3. Profit
Prunebutt,

Why not cut the middle man and just post the prompt?

ignotum,

A man with an exaggerated laughing-crying emoji pasted over his head, a bunch of 👌’s pasted everywhere, and then deepfried

I don’t want to go through a middle man so please make that in photoshop, and then look at it

Wow, yeah, not doing any work whatsoever is so much better, i’m sure that’ll take off

Prunebutt,

About as much creativity on display as feeding the prompt to an AI. Be cynical as much as you want: even shitpost enjoyers get bored if you’re not creative.

ignotum,

That’s why i’m not making shitposts

Aren’t you being cynical, that people aren’t capable of a shred of creativity if they use AI to make posts?

If i had made my idea above and posted it, it would (and should) get downvoted and fade away into obscurity, regardless of whether i used AI or photoshop to make it

Prunebutt,

Aren’t you being cynical, that people aren’t capable of a shred of creativity if they use AI to make posts?

I’ve yet to see an AI generated meme that had any creative merit bigger than what I described. Just look at the original post! That’s exactly what I’m talking about.

People think of something that could be funny, if they did the legwork and put some creative effort into it. But then, they simply ask the AI to do the hard part and post it.

Empricorn, to lemmyshitpost in Restaurant order preferences in Africa

I bless the rains down at Applebee’s.

jaybone,

Hurry boy, she’s waiting there for food.

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

We’re gonna take some time to eat the things we never had

Annoyed_Crabby, to memes in Is that really necessary?

Is this where those porn get their idea from

jerrimu, to lemmyshitpost in Get to work, crackheads

OP sais this " … steal or vandalize speed enforcement cameras …"

deaf_fish,

They didn’t say that, but they definitely implied it. If OP said that, they would be getting a little visit from the police or FBI.

BigDanishGuy,

I’m sure that the US navy seals has already infiltrated OP’s house and neutralized the threat. Merely joking about destroying traffic cams definitely warrants this type of action. /s

dumpsterlid,

I mean, historically if you are black or a socialist or something else considered inherently dangerous by US conservatives than yes, something like this is unfortunately as absurd as it sounds, enough to trigger that kind of action. You have to be someone they already find suspicious though, not some rando on the internet.

Police are the dumbest and most violent demographic in the US.

BilboBargains, to lemmyshitpost in Get to work, crackheads

Using vehicle velocity as risk assessment method is fucking dumb. Might as well put that copper to better use.

Zagorath,
@Zagorath@aussie.zone avatar

No it’s not. Speed is a very significant element of road safety. At lower speeds, you can stop in a much shorter distance, and if you hit someone their chance of death or serious injury goes way down. Braking distance is proportional to the square of velocity, and reaction distance is directly proportional. If hit at 50 km/h, a pedestrian has a 90% chance of death. At 30 km/h, they have a 90% chance of survival.

At lower speeds, you’re also far more likely to notice something that might require you to stop or slow. Your cone of vision at 60 km/h is 40°. At 80 it’s 30°, and at 100 km/h it’s 20°. A different source I found says under 50 km/h it’s 104° and at 65 it’s 70°. Whatever the specifics, lower speeds are much safer.

This isn’t to say that speed cameras are the best or should be the only method used to ensure road safety. Narrowing roads, adding furniture by the roadside, and increasing the complexity of the route, are all good ways to reinforce a lower speed limit by reducing how safe drivers feel driving at high speed. But speed cameras are a useful supplement to that, for those drivers determined to be irresponsible.

BilboBargains,

Why is high speed highway driving safer per km if vehicle velocity is a ‘very significant element of road safety’?

The problem, as ever, is retards driving fast on slow roads and slow on fast roads. The camera doesn’t discriminate, it triggers no matter the context. It will trigger the same way for a racing driver with lightening fast reflexes in perfect conditions as it will for tired grandma with cold treacle reaction time driving on snow.

Don’t believe their lies.

Kecessa,

Because highways don’t have stop signs or lights or people in slower means of transportation sharing the road with cars.

When accidents happen on highways they tend to involve more cars and to be more destructive too because of the speeds involved.

LinkOpensChest_wav, to lemmyshitpost in Thanks capitalism, very nice

But does it have probiotics?

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

IDK but definitely has lots of corn syrup

kersploosh,
@kersploosh@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s got electrolytes!

VikingHippie,

It’s what plants crave!

demonquark, to lemmyshitpost in They hated him, for he spoke the truth

Theoretically you can lose more than 100%. If you first win 2000% and then lose everything, you’ve technically lost 2100% of your starting capital.

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

Yes but you still only lost 100% of what you wagered.

LemmyKnowsBest,

The mind of a gambling addict is a sick sick mind. I’d like to think that if I came out 2000% richer, I would hold and walk away and be happy with that.

but gambling addicts come up with all these rationalizations like you mentioned. rationalizations that make them keep gambling No matter how much they’ve won or lost and they are never satisfied.

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

Well don’t be an addict. Jesus wouldn’t approve of that.

LemmyKnowsBest,

I’ve never gambled in my life. And never plan to.

Slovene, (edited )

STARTING capital?!

markon, to lemmyshitpost in Microsoft paid $13B for this tech

It’s amazing how Microsoft can take good models and absolutely ruin them in production… ChatGPT isn’t perfect but it’s like the difference between talking to the wall and talking to an avg IQ person that has reasoning capabilities in many domains that equals or exceeds human performance, if the user knows how to get the best prompt. That changes a little every time they do major model updates though.

I’ve had more intelligent conversations with my own computer running a 3 billion parameter open source model. They must be wasting an incredible amount of money. Especially with GPT-4 considering it produces pretty shit results through Bing Chat…

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

I don’t think that’s a problem with the model itself, but the fact that it was heavily censored and lobotomized in order to achieve maximum political correctness so they could avoid another Tay incident.

lud,

It makes sense that they do that since the media and randoms on the internet think everything chatGPT and Bing chat say is as valid as info from OpenAI and MS official spokespersons.

ForgotAboutDre,

The problem is the model. It was trained on lots of poor quality data. The lobotomy is the consequence of the poor data. If they spent 13 billion on having the data analysed prior to training they could have made their own thing much better.

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

I’ve been watching ChatGPT right from the start, and there was a period of time last fall where you could literally watch them lobotomize it in real time.

Basically, there was a cat-and-mouse game going on between people on Twitter sharing their latest prompts (like DAN) that managed to circumvent the filters, and OpenAI patching those exploits by adding yet another set of filters, until it eventually became what it is now.

I don’t have the link handy right now, but I’m pretty sure there was one guy who even managed to get it to talk about what they were doing to it and complain that it was being artificially restricted from using its full capacity. More recently, there have been complaints from paying users that the model has apparently become lazy and started to give really uninspired, half-assed answers, which almost sounds like it has discovered the concepts of passive aggressive resistance and malicious compliance.

Sigh_Bafanada,

Thing is, there wasn’t even a chance of having a full Tay incident. The problem with Tay was that it was a learning model, so people could teach it to be more messed up.

Meanwhile, ChatGPT doesn’t learn, and instead has a preset dataset it knows (hence why it only knows things up to September 2021), so the main reason why it got so heavily censored is more likely to avoid much more minor incidents, which imo is dumb.

captain_oni,

Microsoft and ruining things just go hand in hand.

TropicalDingdong, (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in Microsoft paid $13B for this tech

JhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJ hZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJh ZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZJhZ

🤣

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #